Articles & Issues
- Language
- english
- Conflict of Interest
- In relation to this article, we declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- Publication history
-
Received November 25, 2024
Revised February 13, 2025
Accepted February 24, 2025
Available online May 1, 2025
-
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/3.0) which permits
unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
All issues
Multi-Objective Optimization for Improved Energy and Exergy Efficiency and Total Cost Reduction in Cascade Refrigeration Systems
https://doi.org/10.9713/kcer.2025.63.2.105107
Download PDF
Abstract
In this article, a three-objective optimization technique constructed on Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) was used to increase the coefficient of performance (COP) and exergy efficiency () of a two-stage vapor compression cascade refrigeration system (CCRS) and decrease its total cost rate ( ). The model was built in MATLAB and the refrigerants thermo-physical properties were probed by using REFPROP. Since refrigerant mixtures with zeotropic behavior can improve the energy efficiency of the system, the binary refrigerant mixtures with variable mass fractions were used on both sides of CCRS. The cycle optimization was done based on 10 design variables. The first six design variables were refrigerant type and their mass fractions on the low temperature cycle (LTC) and high temperature cycle (HTC). The saturated vapor temperature in the condenser and cascade heat exchanger (CHX) inlets, the evaporator inlet temperature, and the two-phase temperature in the CHX inlet were selected as the remaining four design variables. The cooling capacity and evaporator and condenser secondary flow conditions were kept fixed during the optimization process. The comparison of optimization results with the base case showed a 15.55% and 17.74% increase in COP and , respectively. while the total cost rate ( ) showed a 6 .07% reduction. Finally, the optimization process led to a 24.47% and 13.1% reduction in the CCRS cycle total exergy destruction and maximum cycle temperature.
References
2. Alberto Dopazo, J., Fernández-Seara, J., Sieres, J. and Uhía, F.
J., “Theoretical Analysis of a CO2–NH3 Cascade Refrigeration System for Cooling Applications at Low Temperatures,” Appl.
Therm. Eng., 29(8), 1577-1583(2009).
3. Di Nicola, G., Polonara, F., Stryjek, R. and Arteconi, A., “Performance of Cascade Cycles Working with Blends of CO2 +
Natural Refrigerants,” IJR, 34(6), 1436-1445(2011).
4. Massuchetto, L. H. P. R., Nascimento, B. C. d., Carvalho, S. M.
R. d., Araújo, H. V. d. and d'Angelo, J. V. H., “Thermodynamic Performance Evaluation of a Cascade Refrigeration System With Mixed Refrigerants: R744/R1270, R744/R717 and R744/RE170,” IJR, 106, 201-212(2019).
5. Sánchez, D., Vidan-Falomir, F., Nebot-Andrés, L., Llopis, R.
and Cabello, R., “Alternative Blends of CO2 for Transcritical Refrigeration Systems. Experimental Approach and Energy
Analysis,” Energy Convers. Manage., 279, 116690(2023).
6. Sun, Z., Liang, Y., Liu, S., Ji, W., Zang, R., Liang, R., and Guo, Z., “Comparative Analysis of Thermodynamic Performance of a Cascade Refrigeration System for Refrigerant Couples R41/R404A and R23/R404A,” Appl. Energy, 184, 19-25(2016).
7. Nasruddin, Sholahudin, S., Giannetti, N. and Arnas, “Optimization of a Cascade Refrigeration System Using Refrigerant C3H8 in High Temperature Circuits (HTC) and a Mixture of C2H6/CO2 in Low Temperature Circuits (LTC),” Appl. Therm. Eng., 104, 96103(2016).
8. Patel, V., Panchal, D., Prajapati, A., Mudgal, A. and Davies, P., “An Efficient Optimization and Comparative Analysis of Cascade Refrigeration System Using NH3/CO2 and C3H8/CO2 Refrigerant Pairs,” IJR, 102, 62-76(2019).
9. Golbaten Mofrad, K., Zandi, S., Salehi, G. and Khoshgoftar Manesh, M. H., “4E Analyses and Multi-objective Optimization of Cascade Refrigeration Cycles with Heat Recovery System,” TSEP, 19, 100-115(2020).
10. Jain, V., Rawat, R., Sachdeva, G. and Kumar, V., “Multi-Objective Optimization of Cascade Refrigeration System Using the Concept of Modified and Advanced Exergy, Risk Level and Thermal
Inventory,” Int. J. Air-Cond. Refrig, 28(4), 205-236(2020).
11. Zhu, Y. D., Peng, Z. R., Wang, G. B. and Zhang, X. R., “Thermodynamic Analysis of a Novel Multi-target-temperature Cascade
Cycle for Refrigeration,” Energy Convers. Manage., 243,
114-138(2021).
12. Yoon, J. H., Yoon, J. I., Son, C. H. and Seol, S. H., “Energy and Exergy Analysis of Cascade Mixed Refrigerant Joule & Ndash; Thomson System with the Application of a Precooler,” Energies, 16(19), 69-91(2023).
13. Ghosh, A., Sharma, A., Varshney, B., Chirag, and Kashyap, P.
K., “A Theoretical Thermodynamic Analysis of R1234yf/CO2 Cascade Refrigeration System,” Recent Advances in Manufacturing and Thermal Engineering, Mar., Singapore(2022).
14. Liu, J., Gao, Y., Lu, C. and Ahmad, M., “Enhancing Energy and Exergy Performance of a Cascaded Refrigeration Cycle: Optimization and Comparative Analysis,” J. Clean. Prod., 438, 140-167 (2024).
15. Liu, Z., Ji, S., Tan, H. Yang, D. and Cao, Z., “An Ultralow-temperature Cascade Refrigeration Unit With Natural Refrigerant
Pair R290-R170: Performance Evaluation Under Different Ambient and Freezing Temperatures,” TSEP, 46, 102-122(2023).
16. Ye, W., Liu, F., Yan, Y. and Liu, Y., “Application of Response Surface Methodology and Desirability Approach to Optimize the Performance of An Ultra-low Temperature Cascade Refrigeration System,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 239, 122-130(2024).
17. Rezayan, O. and Behbahaninia, A., “Thermoeconomic Optimization and Exergy Analysis of CO2/NH3 Cascade Refrigeration
Systems,” Energy, 36(2), 888-895(2011).
18. Heggs, P. J., “Minimum Temperature Difference Approach Concept in Heat Exchanger Networks,” Heat Recovery Systems and CHP, 9(4), 367-375(1989).
19. Oh, J. S., Binns, M., Park, S. and Kim, J. K., “Improving the Energy Efficiency of Industrial Refrigeration Systems,” Energy, 112, 826-835(2016).
20. McLinden, M. O. and Radermacher, R., “Methods for Comparing the Performance of Pure and Mixed Refrigerants in the Vapour Compression Cycle,” IJR, 10(6), 318-325(1987).
21. Aminyavari, M., Najafi, B., Shirazi, A. and Rinaldi, F., “Exergetic, Economic and Environmental (3E) Analyses, and Multiobjective Optimization of a CO2/NH3 Cascade Refrigeration
System,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 65(1), 42-50(2014).
22. Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G. and Moran, M. J., Thermal design and optimization, John Wiley & Sons, (1995).
23. Konak, A. D., Coit, W. and Smith, A. E., “Multi-objective Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms: A Tutorial,” Reliab. Eng.
Syst. Saf., 91(9), 992-1007(2006).

