Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.30, No.1, 131-138, 2013
Comparison of cost and treatment efficiency of solar assisted advance oxidation processes for textile dye bath effluent
The study investigated the efficiency and cost effectiveness of solar-assisted photochemical processes in comparison with advance oxidation processes (AOPs) for the textile effluents treatment. Efficiency of UV irradiation alone for one hour in removing color was almost double in comparison to solar radiation alone for effluents of different dye concentrations (E1>E2>E3). For coupled UV/H2O2 process, there was higher color removal efficiency obtained for effluent E3 (85%) as compared to E2 (70%) and E1 (57%), while E1 showed higher COD removal efficiency (70%) as compared to E2 (50%) and E3 (62%). However, the efficiency of solar/H2O2 for COD removal was comparable to UV/ H2O2, i.e., E2 (57%) and E3 (53%). In the case of UV and solar-assisted photo-Fenton processes, removal efficiency of the UV process was further increased as approached to almost 90% removal for E1; on the other hand, the solar-assisted process efficiency remained the same. The relative efficiencies of AOPs were found to be in the order of UV assisted photo-Fenton process>UV/H2O2>UV alone. Although, solar-assisted Fenton treatments were relatively low and slow but without any energy consumption in comparison to high energy consumption of UV. Among the UV processes, UV assisted photo-Fenton treatment appeared to have better color removal efficiency with energy requirements of 5 kWh/m3, 8 kWh/m3 and 3 kWh/m3 for E1, E2 and E3, respectively.
[References]
  1. Gupta VK, Suhas, J. Environ. Manage., 90(8), 2313, 2009
  2. Manu B, Chaudhari S, Bioresour. Technol., 82(3), 225, 2002
  3. Park H, Choi W, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem., 159, 241, 2003
  4. Lucas SM, Peres AJ, Dyes. Pigm., 74, 622, 2007
  5. Yasar A, Nasir A, Aamir AAK, J. Color Technol., 122(4), 201, 2006
  6. Rizzo L, Water Res., 45, 4311, 2011
  7. Vilar VIP, Pinho LX, Pintor AMA, Boaventura RVR, Sol. Energy., 85, 1927, 2011
  8. Ranjit PJD, Palanivelu K, Lee CS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(1), 112, 2008
  9. Dantas TLP, Mendonca VP, Jose HJ, Rodrigues AE, Moreira RFPM, Chem. Eng. J., 118(1-2), 77, 2006
  10. Menendez A, Lombrana JI, de Luis A, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(2), 388, 2011
  11. Park JY, Lee IH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(2), 387, 2011
  12. Azbar N, Yonar T, Kestioglu K, Chemosphere., 55, 35, 2004
  13. Ahmed S, Rasul MG, Martens WN, Brown R, Hashib MA, Water Air Soil. Pollut., 215, 3, 2011
  14. Kim YO, Nam HU, Park YR, Lee JH, Park TJ, Lee TH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(4), 801, 2004
  15. Lee Y, Bae S, Lee W, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(6), 769, 2012
  16. Sciacca F, Rengifo-Herrera JA, Wethe J, Pulgarin C, Sol.Energy., 85, 1399, 2011
  17. Wadley S, Waite TD, Photo-Fenton Oxidation of Pesticides. Enviro 2002 Convention and Exhibition and IWA 3rd World Water Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 7-12 April, 569, 2002
  18. Yasar A, Ahmad N, Khan AAA, Yousaf A, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 1183, 2007
  19. Oller I, Malato S, Sanchez-Perez JS, Sci. Total Environ., 409, 4141, 2011
  20. Arslan I, Balcioglu IA, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 76(1), 53, 2001
  21. Yasar A, Tabinda AB, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 19(5), 1051, 2010
  22. APHA/AWWA/WEF (American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Environment Federation), Standards for examination of water and waste water, 21st Ed. United Book Press, Baltimore, MD, 2005
  23. Eren Z, Acar FN, Eren NH, Color Technol., 126(6), 337, 2010
  24. Aleboyed A, Moussa Y, Aleboyed H, Dyes. Pigm., 66, 129, 2005
  25. Huang YH, Huang YF, Chang PS, Chen CY, J. Hazard. Mater., 154(1-3), 655, 2008
  26. Khan H, Ahmad N, Yasar A, Shahid R, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 19(1), 83, 2010
  27. Kusic H, Koprivanac N, Horvat S, Bakija S, Bozic AL, Chem. Eng. J., 155(1-2), 144, 2005