Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.12, 1745-1751, 2012
Comparison for thermal decomposition and product distribution of chloroform under each argon and hydrogen reaction atmosphere
Thermal reaction studies of diluted mixture (1%) of chloroform (CHCl3) under each argon (Ar) and hydrogen (H2) reaction atmosphere have been investigated to examine the effect of reaction atmosphere on decomposition of CHCl3 and product distributions. The experimental results were obtained over the temperature range 525-900 ℃ with reaction times of 0.3-2.0 sec. at 1 atm by utilizing an isothermal tubular flow reactor. Complete destruction (>99%) of the parent reagent, CHCl3 was observed near 675 ℃ under H2 reaction atmosphere (CHCl3/H2 reaction system) and 700 ℃ under Ar reaction atmosphere (CHCl3/Ar reaction system) with 1 sec reaction time. The CHCl3 pyrolysis yielded more conversion in H2 atmosphere than in Ar atmosphere. Major products in CHCl3/Ar reaction system were C2Cl4, CCl4, C2HCl3 and HCl over a wide temperature range. Hydrocarbon was not found in CHCl3/Ar reaction system. Major products of CHCl3/H2 reaction system observed were CH2Cl2, CH3Cl, CH4, C2Cl4, C2HCl3, C2H2Cl2, C2H3Cl and HCl at 600 ℃ with 1 sec. reaction time. Non-chlorinated hydrocarbons such as CH4, C2H4 and C2H6 were the major products at above 850 ℃. Product distributions were distinctly different in Ar and H2 reaction atmospheres. The H2 gas plays a key role in acceleration of reagent decay and formation of non-chlorinated light hydrocarbons through hydrodechlorination process. The important reaction pathways, based on thermochemical and kinetic principles, to describe the features of reagent decay and intermediate formation under each Ar and H2 reducing reaction atmosphere were investigated.
[References]
  1. Brunner C, Hazardous air emissions from incineration, Chapman and Hall, NY, 2005
  2. Tsang W, Combust. Sci. Technol., 74, 99, 1990
  3. Louw R, Dijks H, Mulder P, Chem. Ind., 19, 759, 1983
  4. Won YS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(1), 36, 2009
  5. Chuang SC, Bozzelli JW, Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 568, 1986
  6. Wu YP, Won YS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 9(6), 775, 2003
  7. Oppelt ET, J. Air Pollution Control Assoc., 37, 558, 1987
  8. Won YS, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 49(5), 510, 2011
  9. Wu YP, Won YS, J. Hazard. Mater., B105, 63, 2003
  10. Manion JA, Louw R, J. Chem. Perk. Trans., 2, 1547, 1988
  11. Won YS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 15(4), 510, 2009
  12. Benson SW, Thermochemical Kinetics, John Wiley and Sons, NY, 1976
  13. Won YS, Bozzelli JW, Combust. Sci. Technol., 85, 345, 1992
  14. Kung FE, Bissinger WE, J. Org. Chem., 29, 2739, 1964
  15. Benson SW, Spokes GN, 11th Symposium (International) on Combustion, 95, 1966
  16. Schug KP, Wagner HG, Zabel F, Ber. Bunsenges Phys.Chem., 83, 167, 1979
  17. Herman IP, Magnotta F, Buss RJ, Lee YT, J. Chem. Phys., 79, 1789, 1983
  18. Allara D, Shaw R, Phys. Chem. Ref. Data., 9, 523, 1981
  19. Won YS, Bozzelli JW, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng., HTD 104, 131, 1988
  20. Benson SW, Weissman M, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 14, 1287, 1982
  21. Parmar SM, Benson SW, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 2652, 1988
  22. Kerr JA, Moss SJ, Handbook of bimolecular and intermolecular gas reactions, CRC Press, Florida, 2009
  23. NIST, Chemical gas kinetics database, Version 5.0, 2008
  24. Won YS, Ph. D. Thesis, New Jersey Inst. Tech., NJ, USA, 1991
  25. Weissman M, Benson SW, J. Phys. Chem., 87, 243, 1983
  26. Dean AM, J. Phys. Chem., 89, 4600, 1985
  27. Won YS, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 17(6), 638, 2006
  28. Won YS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 13(3), 400, 2007
  29. Lee DH, Kim SD, Kim BN, Won YS, Han DH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(6), 1601, 2009