Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.11, 1577-1584, 2012
A comprehensive study on wastewater treatment using photo-impinging streams reactor: Continuous treatment
The degradation of phenol was investigated in a continuous flow impinging streams system. In the first step, statistical experimental designs were used to optimize the process of phenol degradation in a photo-impinging streams reactor. The more important factors affecting phenol degradation (p<0.05) were screened by a two-level Plackett-Burman design. Four of the latter parameters, namely phenol concentration, catalyst loading, pH and slurry flow rate, were selected for final process optimization, applying central composite design (CCD). The predicted data showed that the maximum removal efficiency of phenol (99%) could be obtained under the optimum operating conditions (phenol concentration=50 mg l^(-1), catalyst loading=2.1 g l^(-1), pH 6.2 and slurry flow rate=550ml min^(-1)). These predicted values were then verified by certain validating experiments. A good correlation was observed between the predicted data and those determined by the experimental study. This may confirm the validity of the statistical optimum strategy. Finally, continuous degradation of phenol was performed, and the results indicated a higher efficiency and an increased performance capability of the present reactor in comparison with the conventional processes.
[References]
  1. Ahmed S, Rasul MG, Brown R, Hashib MA, J. Environ.Manage., 92, 311, 2011
  2. Shamaila S, Sajjad AKL, Chen F, Zhang JL, Mater. Res. Bull., 45(10), 1375, 2010
  3. Laokiat L, Khemthong P, Grisdanurak N, Sreearunothai P, Pattanasiriwisawa W, Klysubun W, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(3), 377, 2012
  4. Park JH, Seo YS, Kim HS, Kim IK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(8), 1693, 2011
  5. Subramanian M, Kannan A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(9), 2727, 2010
  6. Vildozo D, Ferronato C, Sleiman M, Chovelon JM, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 94(3-4), 303, 2010
  7. Van Gerven T, Mul G, Moulijn J, Stankiewicz A, Chem. Eng. Process., 46(9), 781, 2007
  8. Royaee SJ, Sohrabi M, Desalination, 253(1-3), 57, 2010
  9. Royaee SJ, Sohrabi M, Soleymani F, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 86(2), 205, 2011
  10. Meshram S, Limaye R, Ghodke S, Nigam S, Sonawane S, Chikate R, Chem. Eng. J., 172(2-3), 1008, 2011
  11. Hyoung Cho I, Duk Zoh K, Dyes Pigm., 75, 533, 2007
  12. Vildozo D, Ferronato C, Sleiman M, Chovelon JM, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 94(3-4), 303, 2010
  13. Abdel-Fattah YR, Saeed HM, Gohar YM, El-Baz MA, Process Biochnol., 40, 1707, 2005
  14. Gheshlaghi R, Scharer JM, Moo-Young M, Douglas PL, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 90(6), 754, 2005
  15. Stanbury PF, Whitaker A, Hall SJ, Media for industrial fermentations, In: Principles of Fermentation Technology, Pergamon, 93, 1986
  16. Khuri AI, Cornell JA, Response surfaces: designs and analysis, New York, Marcel Dekker, ASQA Quality Press, 1996
  17. Montgomery DC, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th Ed.New York, John Wiley and Sons, 170, 2001
  18. Ollis, E. Pelizzetti and N. Serpone N, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 1523, 1991
  19. Chiou CH, Wu CY, Juang RS, Chem. Eng. J., 139(2), 322, 2008
  20. Sobczynski A, Duczmal L, Zmudzinski W, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 213(2), 225, 2004
  21. Pujara K, Kamble SP, Pangarkar VG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(12), 4257, 2007
  22. Malato S, Blanco J, Richter C, Braun B, Maldonado MI, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 17(4), 347, 1998
  23. Suryaman D, Hasegawa K, Kagaya S, Yoshimura T, J. Hazard. Mater., 171(1-3), 318, 2009
  24. Royaee SJ, Sohrabi M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51(11), 4152, 2012