Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.10, 1352-1361, 2012
Comparison of different fluid dynamics in activated sludge system for the treatment of a stimulated milk processing wastewater: Process analysis and optimization
Wastewater from the milk industry usually undergoes activated sludge ahead of refining treatments, final discharge or reuse. To identify the most effective bioreactor hydraulic regime for the secondary treatment of wastewater resulting from the milk industry in an activated sludge system, two lab-scale activated sludge systems characterized by a different configuration and fluid dynamics (i.e., a compartmentalized activated sludge (CAS) with plug flow regime and a complete mixed activated sludge (AS)) were operated in parallel, inoculated with the same microbial consortium and fed with identical streams of a stimulated dairy wastewater. The effect of three process and operational variables--influent chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration, sludge recycle ratio (R) and hydraulic retention time (HRT)--on the performance of the two systems were investigated. Experiments were conducted based on a central composite face-centered design (CCFD) and analyzed using response surface methodology (RSM). The region of exploration for treatment of the synthetic wastewater was taken as the area enclosed by the CODin (200, 1,000 mg/l), R (1, 5), and HRT (2, 5 h) boundaries. To evaluate the process, three parameters, COD removal efficiency (E), specific substrate utilization rate (U), and sludge volume index (SVI), were measured and calculated over the course of the experiments as the process responses. The change of the flow regime from complete-mix to plug flow resulted in considerable improvements in the COD removal efficiency of milk wastewater and sludge settling properties. SVI levels for CAS system (30-58 ml/g) were considerably smaller that for the AS system (50-145 ml/g). In addition, the biomass production yield could be reduced by about 10% compared to the AS system. The results indicated that for the wastewater, the design HRT of a CAS reactor could be shortened to 2-4 h.
[References]
  1. Russell P, Milk Ind. Int., 10, 36, 1998
  2. Woodard and Curran, Industrial Waste Treatment Handbook, 2nd Ed., Elsevier, 2006
  3. Burton C, Dairy Ind. Int., 12, 21, 1997
  4. Vidal G, Carvalho A, Mendez R, Lema JM, Bioresour. Technol., 74(3), 231, 2000
  5. Donkin J, Int. J. Dairy Tech., 50, 67, 1997
  6. Berruga MI, Jaspe A, San-Jose C, Int. Biodeter. Biodeg., 40, 119, 1997
  7. Arceivala JS, Wastewater treatment for pollution control, McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 1998
  8. Burgess JE, Quarmby J, Biotechnol. Adv., 17, 49, 1999
  9. Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003
  10. Grady PLG, Daigger GT, Lim HC, Biological wastewater treatment, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999
  11. Song KH, Lee KR, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(1), 116, 2007
  12. Abdulgader ME, Yu QJ, Williams P, Zinatizadeh AAL, In Proceedings of 1st Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning and Economics, Greece, 2007
  13. Yu QJ, Xu H, Yao D, Williams P, Water Sci. Technol., 11, 189, 2003
  14. Sirianuntapilboon S, Jeeyachok N, Larplai R, J. Environ. Manage., 76, 177, 2005
  15. Garrido JM, Omil F, Arrojo B, Mendez R, Lema JM, Water Sci. Technol., 43, 2498, 2001
  16. Keller J, Watts S, Battye-Smith W, Chong R, Water Sci. Technol., 43, 355, 2001
  17. Zhou Z, Wu Z, Wang Z, Tang S, Gu G, Wang L, Wang Y, Xin Z, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(5), 1233, 2011
  18. Bandpi AM, Bazari H, Iran, J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 1, 65, 2004
  19. Casey E, Glennon B, Hamer G, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 62(2), 183, 1999
  20. Lim JW, Ng SL, Khor SM, Seng CE, Korean J. Chem.Eng., DOI:10.1007/s11814-011-0267-2, 2012
  21. Raj SA, Murthy DVS, J. Environ. Sci. Health., A34, 357, 1999
  22. Britz TJ, Schalkwyk C, Hung YT, Waste Treatment in the Food Processing Industry, Chapter one, Treatment of Dairy Processing Wastewater, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2006
  23. Donkin J, Russell JM, Water Sci. Technol., 36, 79, 1997
  24. Altaf M, Naveena BJ, Reddy G, Bioresour. Technol., 98(3), 498, 2007
  25. Shi XY, Yu HQ, Process Biochem., 40, 645, 2005
  26. Cui JD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(1), 174, 2010
  27. Yang K, Yu Y, Hwang S, Water Res., 37, 2467, 2003
  28. Aghamohammadi N, Aziz HB, Isa MH, Zinatizadeh AA, Bioresour. Technol., 98(18), 3570, 2007
  29. Hadavifar M, Zinatizadeh AA, Younesi H, Galehdar M, Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng., 313, 2009
  30. Zinatizadeh AAL, Mohamed AR, Abdullah AZ, Mashitah MD, Hasnain M, Najafpour GD, Water Res., 40, 3193, 2006
  31. Ziabari M, Mottaghitalab V, Haghi AK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(1), 340, 2010
  32. Akhbari A, Zinatizadeh AAL, Mohammadi P, Irandoust M, Mansouri Y, Chem. Eng. J., 168(1), 269, 2011
  33. Mohseni-Bandpi A, Bazari H, Iranian, J. Env. Health Sci. Eng., 1, 65, 2004
  34. Flapper TG, Ashbolt NJ, Lee AT, From the lab to full scale SBR operation: Treating high strength variable industrial wastewater, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Sequencing Batch Reactor Technology, July, 2000
  35. Wintgens T, Rosen J, Melin T, Brepols C, Drensla K, Engelhardt N, J. Membr. Sci., 216(1-2), 55, 2003
  36. Oliveira DS, Prinholato AC, Ratusznei SM, Rodriguesa JAD, Zaiat M, Foresti E, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 10, 2009
  37. Farizoglu B, Keskinler B, Yildiz E, Nuhoglu A, Process Biochem., 39, 2283, 2004
  38. Kuehl R, Design of Experiments: Statistical principles of research design and analysis, C. A: Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, 2000
  39. Khuri AI, Cornell JA, Response surfaces: Design and analyses, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996
  40. APHA, WPCF, AWWA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Ed., American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington DC, 1999
  41. Montgomery DC, Design and analysis of experiments, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 1996
  42. Mason RL, Gunst RF, Hess JL, Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments, eighth applications to engineering and science, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003
  43. Hosseini B, Najafpour GD, Sadeghpour M, Asadi M, Chem.Ind., 3, 468, 2008
  44. Chakraborty S, Veeramani H, Process Biochem., 41, 96, 2006
  45. Octave Levenspiel, Chemical Reaction Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2003
  46. Wong YS, Omar M, Kadir AB, Teng TT, Bioresour. Technol., 21, 2009
  47. Liu Y, Tay JH, Biotechnol. Adv., 22, 533, 2004
  48. Nieder V, Kutzer M, Kren V, Gallego RG, Kamerling JP, Elling L, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 34(5), 407, 2004