Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.9, 1246-1252, 2012
Steam regeneration of acetone and toluene in activated carbon and dealuminated Y-zeolite beds
The dynamics of steam regeneration in activated carbon and dealuminated Y-zeolite (DAY-zeolite) beds was studied to recover acetone and toluene from effluent gases. Due to the higher adsorption capacity of acetone on both adsorbents, the desorption breakthrough of toluene was faster than that of acetone, but the breakthrough shape of acetone was steeper than that of toluene. The variation in breakthrough time as a function of steam flow rate was less in the activated carbon bed than in the DAY-zeolite bed. The inside temperature profiles during regeneration showed stepwise shapes. A temperature plateau was observed near 355 K for toluene, which is lower than its boiling temperature and azeotrope. A temperature plateau for acetone occurred near 330 K, near its boiling temperature. The duration of the temperature plateau at the bed end corresponded with the time period of high desorption concentration during acetone desorption; for toluene, plateau duration was shorter than the duration of high desorption concentration. The maximum effluent concentration of toluene reached only 80% of the feed concentration, while that of acetone was almost 100%. Therefore, the water-miscibility of the adsorbate was an important factor in steam regeneration.
[References]
  1. Monneyron P, Manero MH, Foussard JN, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2410, 2003
  2. Lillo-Rodenas MA, Carratala-Abril J, Cazorla-Amoros D, Linares-Solano A, Fuel Process. Technol., 77-78, 331, 2002
  3. Kang M, Bae YS, Lee CH, Carbon., 43, 1512, 2005
  4. Brosillon S, Manero MH, Foussard JN, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 3571, 2001
  5. Kang M, Lee CH, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 266(2), 163, 2004
  6. Das D, Gaur V, Verma N, Carbon., 42, 2949, 2004
  7. Hu XJ, Qiao SZ, Zhao XS, Lu GQ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(3), 862, 2001
  8. Adolphs J, Setzer MJ, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 180(1), 70, 1996
  9. Guillemot M, Mijoin J, Mignard S, Magnoux P, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(13), 4614, 2007
  10. Serrano DP, Calleja G, Botas JA, Gutierrez FJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(22), 7010, 2004
  11. Ahn H, Lee CH, AIChE J., 49(6), 1601, 2003
  12. Lee JJ, Kim MK, Lee DG, Ahn H, Kim MJ, Lee CH, AIChE J., 54(8), 2054, 2008
  13. Lee SJ, Jung JH, Moon JH, Jee JG, Lee CH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(11), 3720, 2007
  14. Manjare SD, Ghoshal AK, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(19), 6563, 2006
  15. Blocki SW, Environ. Prog., 12, 226, 1993
  16. Kim JH, Lee SJ, Kim MB, Lee JJ, Lee CH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(13), 4584, 2007
  17. Lee DG, Kim JH, Lee CH, Sep. Purif. Technol., 77(3), 312, 2011
  18. Yun JH, Choi DK, Moon H, Chem. Eng. Sci., 55(23), 5857, 2000
  19. Oh KJ, Park DW, Kim SS, Park SW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(2), 632, 2010
  20. Grande CA, Gascon J, Kapteijn F, Rodrigues AE, Chem. Eng. J., 160(1), 207, 2010
  21. Perry RH, Green DW, Maloney JO, Perry’s chemical engineers' handbook, 6th Ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1984
  22. Ryu YK, Chang JW, Jung SY, Lee CH, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 47(2), 363, 2002
  23. Ryu YK, Lee HJ, Yoo HK, Lee CH, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 47(5), 1222, 2002