Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.11, 1525-1530, 2012
Catalytic steam reforming of biomass-derived tar for hydrogen production with K2CO3/NiO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst
A major problem of using Ni-based catalysts is deactivation during catalytic cracking and reforming, lowering catalytic performance of the catalysts. Modification of catalyst with alkali-loading was expected to help reduce coke formation, which is a cause of the deactivation. This paper investigated the effects of alkali-loading to aluminasupported Ni catalyst on catalytic performance in steam reforming of biomass-derived tar. Rice husk and K2CO3 were employed as the biomass feedstock and the alkali, respectively. The catalysts were prepared by a wet impregnation method with γ-Al2O3 as a support. A drop-tube fixed bed reactor was used to produce tar from biomass in a pyrolysis zone incorporated with a steam reforming zone. The result indicated that K2CO3/NiO/γ-Al2O3 is more efficient for steam reforming of tar released from rice husk than NiO/γ-Al2O3 in terms of carbon conversion and particularly hydrogen production. Effects of reaction temperature and steam concentration were examined. The optimum temperature was found to be approximately 1,073 K. An increase in steam concentration contributed to more tar reduction. In addition, the K2CO3-promoted NiO/γ-Al2O3 was found to have superior stability due to lower catalyst deactivation.
[References]
  1. Devi L, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJJG, Fuel Process. Technol., 86(6), 707, 2005
  2. Chen G, Andries J, Spliethoff H, Energy Conv. Manag., 44(14), 2289, 2003
  3. Narvaez I, Orio A, Aznar MP, Corella J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(7), 2110, 1996
  4. Delgado J, Aznar MP, Corella J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(10), 3637, 1996
  5. Corella J, Toledo JM, Aznar MP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41(14), 3351, 2002
  6. Devi L, Craje M, Thune P, Ptasinski KJ, Janssen FJJG, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 294(1), 68, 2005
  7. Rapagna S, Jand N, Foscolo PU, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 23(7), 551, 1998
  8. Zhang RQ, Cummer K, Suby A, Brown RC, Fuel Process. Technol., 86(8), 861, 2005
  9. Arauzo J, Radlein D, Piskorz J, Scott DS, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(1), 67, 1997
  10. Corella J, Orio A, Aznar P, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37(12), 4617, 1998
  11. Simell P, Kurkela E, Stahlberg P, Hepola J, Catal. Today, 27(1-2), 55, 1996
  12. Abu El-Rub Z, Bramer EA, Brem G, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(22), 6911, 2004
  13. Osaki T, Mori T, J. Catal., 204(1), 89, 2001
  14. Zhang RQ, Brown RC, Suby A, Cummer K, Energy Conv. Manag., 45(7-8), 995, 2004
  15. Simell PA, Hirvensalo EK, Smolander VT, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(4), 1250, 1999
  16. Coll R, Salvado J, Farriol X, Montane D, Fuel Process. Technol., 74(1), 19, 2001
  17. Furusawa T, Tsutsumi A, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 278(2), 195, 2005
  18. Furusawa T, Tsutsumi A, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 278(2), 207, 2005
  19. Wang TJ, Chang J, Wu CZ, Fu Y, Chen Y, Biomass Bioenerg., 28(5), 508, 2005
  20. Srinakruang J, Sato K, Vitidsant T, Fujimoto K, Catal. Commun., 6, 437, 2005
  21. Veraa MJ, Bell AT, Fuel., 57, 194, 1978
  22. Jin RC, Chen YX, Li WZ, Cui W, Ji YY, Yu CY, Jiang Y, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 201(1), 71, 2000
  23. Melo F, Morlans N, Catal. Today., 133-135, 383, 2008
  24. Murakami T, Xu GW, Suda T, Matsuzawa Y, Tani H, Fujimori T, Fuel, 86(1-2), 244, 2007
  25. Sehested J, J. Catal., 217(2), 417, 2003
  26. Franco C, Pinto F, Gulyurtlu I, Cabrita I, Fuel, 82(7), 835, 2003
  27. Wei LG, Xu SP, Zhang L, Liu CH, Zhu H, Liu SQ, Int.J. Hydrog. Energy., 32, 24, 2007
  28. Lv PM, Chang J, Wang TJ, Fu Y, Chen Y, Zhu JX, Energy Fuels, 18(1), 228, 2004
  29. Huang Y, Jin B, Zhong Z, Xiao R, Zhou H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(4), 698, 2007
  30. Seo Y, Jo SH, Ryu HJ, Bae DH, Ryu CK, Yi CK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 457, 2007