Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.9, 1211-1215, 2012
The effects of culture condition on the growth property and docosahexaenoic acid production from Thraustochytrium aureum ATCC 34304
The effect of the composition of artificial sea water (ASW) medium on the growth properties and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) production from Thraustochytrium aureum ATCC 34304 was investigated. A maximum dry cell weight (DCW) of 3.71 g/l was obtained when the NaCl and MgSO4 concentration in the ASW media were 15 and 0 g/l, respectively. The maximum initial specific growth (ISG) rate of 0.16 was attained at 7.5 g/l NaCl and 18 g/l MgSO4, while the minimum ISG rate (0.02) was obtained at 5.0 g/l NaCl and 4.5 g/l MgSO4. The least doubling time required for biomass production was 4.3 h at 7.5 g/l NaCl and different MgSO4 concentrations. A maximum of 7.9 g/l DCW was obtained on the fourth day of cultivation at 30 g/l glucose and 2.5 g/l (each) yeast extract (YE) and peptone. The DHA content in the lipids was significantly affected by the concentration of glucose and nitrogen sources (YE and peptone) in the ASW medium. At the lowest glucose (10 g/l) and YE/peptone (0.5 g/l) concentration and highest glucose (30 g/l) and YE/peptone (2.5 g/l) concentration, the DHA content was 34.725 and 40.33%, respectively, relative to total lipid content. However, the DHA content in the lipid was not affected by the NaCl and MgSO4 concentration. At the lowest NaCl (2.5 g/l) and MgSO4 (4.5 g/l) concentration and highest NaCl (60 g/l) and MgSO4 (18 g/l) concentration the DHA content was 39.62 and 38.48%, respectively. The maximum DHA content in the lipid was 49.01% after four days of cultivation when 7.5 g/l NaCl and 4.5 g/l MgSO4 were in the ASW medium. The growth properties of T.aureum ATCC 34304 for biomass production and DHA yield in the lipid content were found to be affected by NaCl and glucose concentration.
[References]
  1. Berge JP, Barnathan G, Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., 96, 49, 2005
  2. Gill I, Valivety R, Trends Biotechnol., 15, 401, 1997
  3. Perveen Z, Ando H, Ueno A, Ito Y, Yamamoto Y, Yamada Y, Takagi T, Kaneko T, Kogame K, Okuyama H, Biotechnol. Lett., 28(3), 197, 2006
  4. Kang DH, Anbu P, Jeong YS, Chaulagain BP, Seo JW, Hur BK, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 15, 261, 2010
  5. Simopoulos AP, Experiment. Biol. Med., 233, 674, 2008
  6. Burja AM, Radianingtyas H, Windust A, Barrow CJ, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 72(6), 1161, 2006
  7. Yamamura R, Shimomura Y, J. Am.Oil Chem. Soc., 74, 1435, 1997
  8. Kang DH, Jeh EJ, Seo JW, Chun BH, Hur BK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(4), 651, 2007
  9. Fan KW, Jiang Y, Ho LT, Chen F, J. Agric. Food Chem., 57, 6334
  10. Ward OP, Singh A, Process Biochem., 40, 3627, 2005
  11. Raghukumar S, Marine Biotechnol., 10, 631, 2008
  12. Harwood JL, Guschina IA, Biochimie., 91, 679, 2009
  13. Anbu P, Kim DU, Jeh EJ, Jeong YS, Hur BK, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 12, 720, 2007
  14. Bajpai BK, Bajpai P, Ward OP, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 68, 509, 1991
  15. Hur BK, Cho DW, Kim HJ, Park CI, Suh HJ, Biotechnol.Bioprocess Eng., 7, 10, 2002
  16. Lepage G, Roy CC, J. Lipid Res., 25, 1391, 1984
  17. Yokochi T, Honda D, Higashihara T, Nakahara T, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 49(1), 72, 1998
  18. Raghukumar S, Eur. J. Protistol., 38, 127, 2002
  19. Dotsch A, Severin J, Alt W, Galinski EA, Kreft JU, AAPG Bull., 154, 2956, 2008
  20. Iida I, Nakahara T, Yokochi T, Kamisaka Y, Yagi H, Yamaoka M, Suzuki O, J. Ferment. Bioeng., 81(1), 76, 1996
  21. Nagano N, Taoka Y, Honda D, Hayashi M, J. Oleo Sci., 58, 623, 2009
  22. Kumon Y, Yokoyama R, Haque Z, Yokochi T, Honda D, Nakahara T, Marine Biotechnol., 8, 170, 2006
  23. Jacobsen AN, Doctoral Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2008
  24. Feng FY, Yang W, Jiang GZ, Xu YN, Kuang TY, Process Biochem., 40, 1315, 2005
  25. Singh A, Wilson S, Ward OP, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 12, 76, 1996
  26. Yaguchi T, Tanaka S, Yokochi T, Nakahara T, Higashihara T, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 74, 1431, 1997