Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.4, 444-451, 2012
Operational strategy to minimize operating costs in liquefied natural gas receiving terminals using dynamic simulation
Although the operation of an LNG receiving terminal, especially for LNG unloading process, is important in terms of economics and safety, the systematic approach for this process is deficient with regard to operating variables and inherent terminal characteristics. Because the characteristics of each LNG terminal vary according to its individual condition, it is worth to investigate the operational method manipulating operating variables to reduce operating costs regarding terminal characteristics. In this study, we perform a rigorous and extensive dynamic simulation of LNG unloading process to demonstrate the effects of terminal characteristics, including the total length of the pipeline, the number of storage tanks, the ambient temperature, and the operation cycle. Based on simulation results and cost analyses, we can suggest an operational strategy to minimize the operating cost in LNG receiving terminals.
[References]
  1. BP Statistical Review of World Energy., 2009
  2. Hasan MMF, Zheng AM, Karimi IA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(21), 9571, 2009
  3. Korea Gas Corporation, LNG Tank Technology Center, Development and Application of LNG Storage Tanks at KOGAS, 2004
  4. Shi JQ, Beduz C, Scurlock RG, Cryogenics., 33, 1116, 1993
  5. Germeles AE, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering., 21, 1975
  6. Sarsten JS, Pipeline and Gas Journal., 199, 37, 1972
  7. Bates S, Morrison DS, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 40(8), 1875, 1997
  8. Heestand J, Shipman CW, Meader JW, AIChE J., 29, 199, 1983
  9. Shin MW, Shin D, Choi SH, Yoon ES, Han CG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(20), 6540, 2007
  10. Shin MW, Shin D, Choi SH, Yoon ES, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(1), 7, 2008
  11. Lee CJ, Lim Y, Park C, Lee S, Han C, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(17), 8219, 2010
  12. Park C, Lee CJ, Lim Y, Lee S, Han C, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 41, 482, 2010
  13. Liu CW, Zhang JA, Xu Q, Gossage JL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(16), 7412, 2010
  14. Baker RW, Lokhandwala K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(7), 2109, 2008
  15. Wishart J, Dong Z, Secanell A, J. Power Sources, 161(2), 1041, 2006
  16. Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR, 2nd Ed., WILEY, New York, 2004