Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.3, 384-391, 2012
Optimization of salts in medium for production of carboxymethylcellulase by a psychrophilic marine bacterium, Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10 using two statistical methods
The concentration of four mineral salts in the medium for the production of carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase) by Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10 were optimized using orthogonal array method (OAM) and response surface method (RSM) and their results from two statistical methods were compared. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) of data from central composite design (CCD) based on OAM indicated that potassium phosphate gave the highest percentage participation for cell growth as well as production of CMCase. However, their relative participations of four salts for cell growth were different from those for production of CMCase. The ANOVA of results from RSM indicated that highly significant factors (“probe>F” less than 0.0001) for cell growth were K2HPO4 and (NH4)2SO4, whereas those for production of CMCase were K2HPO4, NaCl, and MgSO4·7H2O. The optimal concentration of K2HPO4, NaCl, MgSO4· 7H2O, and (NH4)2SO4 for cell growth extracted by Design Expert Software based on RSM were 7.10, 0.84, 0.24, and 0.33 g/L, respectively, whereas those for production of CMCase were 3.00, 0.52, 0.34, and 0.45 g/L. The optimal concentrations of salts for cell growth and production of CMCase using RSM basically coincided with those using OAM as well as those from ‘one-factor-at-a-time’ method. The production of CMCase by P. aquimaris LBH-10 with optimized concentrations of salts was 273.0 U/mL, which was enhanced by 1.27 times higher than the previous report.
[References]
  1. Yi JC, Sandra JC, John AB, Shu TC, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 553, 1999
  2. Ballesteros M, Oliva JM, Negro MJ, Manzanares P, Ballesteros I, Process Biochem., 39, 1843, 2004
  3. Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Mathew GM, Pandey A, Renew. Energy., 34, 421, 2009
  4. Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Gao W, Chung, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 16, 542, 2011
  5. Niranjane AP, Madhou P, Stevenson TW, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40(6), 1464, 2007
  6. Chi Z, Chi Z, Zhang T, Liu G, Li J, Wang X, Biotechnol. Adv., 27, 236, 2009
  7. Rasmussnen RS, Morrissey M, Adv. Food Nut. Res., 52, 237, 2007
  8. Kim HJ, Gao W, Lee YJ, Chung CH, Lee JW, J. Life Sci., 20, 487, 2010
  9. Mawadza C, Hatti-Kaul R, Zvauya R, Mattiasson B, J. Biotechnol., 83, 177, 2000
  10. Gavaco-Paulo A, Carbohydr. Polym., 37, 273, 1998
  11. Cui JD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(1), 174, 2010
  12. Li Y, Xing J, Li W, Xiong X, Li X, Liu H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(5), 781, 2007
  13. Azin M, Moravej R, Zareh D, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40(4), 801, 2007
  14. Sen R, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 68(3), 263, 1997
  15. Lee BH, Kim BK, Lee YJ, Chung CH, Lee JW, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 46(1), 38, 2010
  16. Kim BK, Lee BH, Lee YJ, Jin IH, Chung CH, Lee JW, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 44(6-7), 411, 2009
  17. Khuri AI, Cornell JA, Response surfaces: Design and analysis, New York, Marcel Dekker, 1987
  18. Gao W, Lee YJ, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 15, 837, 2010
  19. Jin IH, Jung DY, Son CW, Kim SK, Gao W, Chung CH, Lee JW, Biotechnol. Bioproces Eng., 16, 245, 2011
  20. Lee NK, Jo YB, Jin IH, Son CW, Lee JW, J. Life Sci., 19, 1033, 2009
  21. Kalogiannis S, Iakovidou G, Liakopoulos-Kyriakides M, Kyriakidis DA, Skaracis GN, Process Biochem., 39, 249, 2003
  22. Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Lakshmanan GMA, Sridharan R, Panneerselvam R, Comp. Rend. Biol., 330, 806, 2007
  23. Senthilkumar SR, Ashokkumar B, Raj KC, Gunasekaran P, Bioresour. Technol., 96(12), 1380, 2005
  24. Hongwen C, Baishan F, Zongding H, Biochem. Eng. J., 25, 47, 2005
  25. Lee YJ, Kim BK, Lee BH, Jo KI, Lee NK, Chung CH, Lee YC, Lee JW, Bioresour. Technol., 99(2), 378, 2008