Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.11, 2170-2177, 2011
Simulation study of biobutanol production in a polymer-loaded two-phase partitioning bioreactor (PL-TPPB): Model development
The conventional two-phase partitioning bioreactor (TPPB) containing an organic solvent as a second phase was found to be hardly efficient for biobutanol production because of the relatively low partitioning coefficient of butanol between the organic solvent and aqueous solution. Polymer bead was alternatively employed as the second phase in the TPPB, and Dowex Optipore L-493, a copolymer of styrene and divinyl benzene, was chosen as the optimum polymer because it shows the highest partitioning coefficients of butanol, acetone, ethanol and butyric acid against the aqueous phase among candidate polymers. The mass transfer coefficients of compounds from the aqueous phase into polymer beads were experimentally determined with respect to agitation speed. The mass transfer coefficient related to the stripping of volatile compounds by nitrogen gas was also determined, and the influence of gas flow rate turned out to be greater than that of the agitation speed, though both influences were remarkable. A mathematical model for the TPPB containing the polymer beads was suggested and as many as 40 parameters were cited from other publications or determined in this study. This mathematical model will be subsequently used for the detailed simulation study.
[References]
  1. Hong YK, Hong WH, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 45(5), 424, 2007
  2. Antoni D, Zverlov VV, Schwarz WH, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 77(1), 23, 2007
  3. Jeon DJ, Yeom SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(5), 1555, 2010
  4. Sang BI, Kim YH, News Inf. Chem. Eng., 26(6), 704, 2008
  5. Cha WO, News Inf. Chem. Eng., 25(6), 609, 2007
  6. Izak P, Ruth W, Fei Z, Dyson PJ, Kragl U, Chem. Eng. J., 139(2), 318, 2008
  7. Qureshi N, Maddox IS, Friedel A, Biotechnol. Progr., 8, 382, 1992
  8. Ennis BM, Marshall CT, Maddox IS, Paterson AHJ, Biotechnol. Lett., 8, 725, 1986
  9. Ezeji TC, Karcher PM, Qureshi N, Blaschek HP, Biopro. Biosyst. Eng., 27, 207, 2005
  10. Yoon JY, Park CH, Kim WJ, Korean J. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 15(4), 380, 2000
  11. Ei-Zanati E, Abdel-Hakim E, El-Ardi O, Fahmy M, J. Membr. Sci., 280(1-2), 278, 2006
  12. Qureshi N, Hughes S, Maddox IS, Cotta MA, Biopro. Biosyst. Eng., 27, 215, 2005
  13. Barton WE, Daugulis AJ, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 36, 632, 1992
  14. Cho MO, Lee SM, Sang BI, Um YS, KSBB J., 24, 446, 2009
  15. Daugulis AJ, Trends Biotechnol., 19, 459, 2001
  16. Yeom SH, Daugulis AJ, Process Biochem., 36, 765, 2001
  17. Yeom SH, Daugulis AJ, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 72(2), 156, 2001
  18. Yeom SH, Daugulis AJ, Lee SH, Process Biochem., 45, 1582, 2010
  19. Yeom SH, Daugulis AJ, Nielsen DR, Biotechnol. Prog., 26(6), 1777, 2010
  20. Littlejohns JV, McAuley KB, Daugulis AJ, J. Hazard. Mater., 175(1-3), 872, 2010
  21. Miller GL, Anal. Chem., 31, 426, 1959
  22. Nielsen DR, Prather KJ, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 102(3), 811, 2009
  23. Yang XP, Tsao GT, Biotechnol. Prog., 10(5), 532, 1994
  24. Barton WE, Daugulis AJ, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 36, 632, 1992
  25. Qureshi N, Blaschek HP, Renew. Eng., 22, 557, 2001
  26. Mulchandani A, Voleski B, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 64, 625, 1986
  27. Truong KN, Blackburn JW, Environ. Prog., 3, 143, 1984