Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.1, 72-76, 2012
Chitosan microgel: Effect of cross-linking density on pH-dependent release
Chitosan microgels were prepared by a spray-drying method using glutaraldehyde (GA) as a cross-linker. Two kinds of microgels, so-called soft microgel and hard microgel, were prepared using a chitosan to GA ratio of 1 : 0.08, and 1 : 0.67, respectively. The surfaces of hard microgels were more even that those of soft microgels. The swelling ratio, a measure of degree of swelling, of the soft microgel was pH-sensitive, and it decreased from 1,765% to 1,230%, when the pH increased from 4.0 to 9.0. The deprotonation of amino groups of chitosan could account for the decrease in swelling ratio. The swelling ratio of hard microgels was almost invariable in response to pH change (4.0 to 9.0), and it was much less than that of soft microgels, possibly due to the high cross-linking density. The degree of release from the soft microgels decreased from 65% to 12% when the pH of medium increased from 4.0 to 6.0. FITC-dextran would readily diffuse out of the microgel, possibly due to the larger meshes of the microgels in a strong acidic condition (e.g., pH 4.0). However, the degree of release increased from 12% to 82% when the pH of medium increased from 6.0 to 9.0. In this pH range, the fluorescence dye is believed to be released mainly by a squeezing-out.
[References]
  1. Xu DY, Li GJ, Liao ZF, He XH, Polym. Bull., 62(2), 183, 2009
  2. Risbud MV, Hardikar AA, Bhat SV, Bhonde RR, J. Control Release., 68, 23, 2000
  3. Soppimath KS, Kulkarni AR, Aminabhavi TM, J. Control Release., 75, 331, 2001
  4. Kang MK, Kim JC, Colloid Polym. Sci., 288, 265, 2010
  5. Kim YH, Bae YH, Kim SW, J. Control Release., 28, 143, 1994
  6. Feil H, Bae YH, Kim SW, Macromolecules., 25, 5528, 1992
  7. Gutowska A, Bae YH, Feijen J, Kim SW, J. Control Release., 22, 95, 1992
  8. Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Bromberg L, Concheiro A, Photochem. Photobiol., 85, 848, 2009
  9. Yui N, Okano T, Skurai Y, J. Control Release., 26, 141, 1993
  10. Qiu Y, Park K, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 53, 321, 2001
  11. Murdan SJ, J. Control Release., 92, 1, 2003
  12. Li H, Yuan Z, Lam KY, Lee HP, Chen J, Hanes J, Fu J, Biosens. Bioelectron., 19, 1097, 2004
  13. Connor J, Huang LJ, Cell Biol., 101, 582, 1985
  14. Drummond DC, Zignani M, Leroux JC, Prog. Lipid Res., 39, 409, 2000
  15. Chu CJ, Dijkstra J, Lai MZ, Hong K, Szoka FC, Pharm. Res., 7, 824, 1990
  16. Huguet ML, Neufeld RJ, Dellacherie E, Process Biochem., 31(4), 347, 1996
  17. Silva CM, Ribeiro AJ, Figueiredo M, Ferreira D, Veiga F, AAPS J., 7, E903, 2005
  18. Simoes S, Moreira JN, Fonseca C, Duzgune N, Lima MCP, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 56, 947, 2004
  19. Jo SM, Lee HY, Kim JC, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 45, 421, 2009
  20. Pelton R, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 85, 1, 2000
  21. Oh JK, Lee DI, Park JM, Prog. Polym. Sci., 34, 1261, 2009
  22. Zhang H, Mardyani S, Chan WCW, Kumacheva E, Biomacromolecules, 7(5), 1568, 2006
  23. Mansouri S, Lavigne P, Corsi K, Benderdour M, Beaumont E, Fernandes JC, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 57, 1, 2004
  24. Thanou M, Verhoef JC, Junginger HE, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 52, 117, 2001
  25. Zhang L, Jin Y, Liu HQ, Du YM, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 82(3), 584, 2001
  26. Xue ZX, Yang GP, Zhang ZP, He BL, React. Funct.Polym., 66, 893, 2006
  27. Oh JK, Lee DI, Park JM, Prog. Polym. Sci., 34, 1261, 2009
  28. Rao BS, Murthy KVR, Int. J. Pharm., 231, 97, 2002
  29. Williams DR, Coord. Chem. Rev., 151, 161, 1996