Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.6, 1474-1479, 2011
Computational fluid dynamics simulations of pressure drop and heat transfer in fixed bed reactor with spherical particles
Fixed bed reactors are among the most important equipment in chemical industries as these are used in chemical processes. An accurate insight into the fluid flow in these reactors is necessary for their modeling. The pressure drop and heat transfer coefficient have been studied for the fixed bed reactor with tube to particle diameter ratio (N) of 4.6 and comprising 130 spherical particles using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The simulations were carried out in a wide range of Reynolds number: 3.85≤Re≤611.79. The RNG k-ε turbulence model was used in the turbulent regime. The CFD results were compared with empirical correlations in the literature. The predicted pressure drop values in laminar flow were overestimated compared with the Ergun’s [27] correlation and underestimated in the turbulent regime due to the wall friction and the flow channeling in the bed, respectively. It was observed that the CFD results of the pressure drop are in good agreement with the correlations of Zhavoronkov et al. [28] and Reichelt [29] because the wall effects have been taken into account in these correlations. Values of the predicted dimensionless heat transfer coefficient showed better agreement with the Dixon and Labua’s [32] correlation. This is explained by the fact that this correlation is a function of the particle size and shape in the bed.
[References]
  1. Jakobsen HA, Chemical reactor modeling multiphase reactive flows, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 954, 2008
  2. Ranade VV, Computational flow modeling for chemical reactor engineering, Academic Press, New York, 403, 2002
  3. Joshi JB, Ranade VV, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(6), 1115, 2003
  4. Carman PC, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 15, 150, 1937
  5. Coulson JM, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 27, 237, 1949
  6. Eisfeld B, Schnitzlein K, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(14), 4321, 2001
  7. Mehta D, Hawley MC, Ind. Eng. Chem., 8, 280, 1969
  8. Foumeny EA, Benyahia F, Castro JAA, Moallemi HA, Roshani S, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer., 36, 536, 1993
  9. Nijemeisland M, Dixon AG, AIChE J., 50(5), 906, 2004
  10. Dalman MT, Merkin JH, McGreavy C, Computers and Fluids., 14, 267, 1986
  11. Lloyd B, Boehm R, Numer. Heat Trans. A., 26, 237, 1994
  12. Derkx OR, Dixon AG, Numer. Heat Trans. A., 29, 777, 1996
  13. Calis HPA, Nijenhuis J, Paikert BC, Dautzenberg FM, van den Bleek CM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(4), 1713, 2001
  14. Nijemeisland M, Dixon AG, Chem. Eng. J., 82(1-3), 231, 2001
  15. Guardo A, Coussirat M, Larrayoz MA, Recasens F, Egusquiza E, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(22), 7049, 2004
  16. Guardo A, Coussirat M, Larrayoz MA, Recasens F, Egusquiza E, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(6), 1733, 2005
  17. Gunjal PR, Ranade VV, Chaudhari RV, AIChE J., 51(2), 365, 2005
  18. Dixon AG, Nijemeisland M, Stitt EH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(16), 6342, 2005
  19. Wen DS, Ding YL, Chem. Eng. Sci., 61(11), 3532, 2006
  20. Reddy RK, Joshi JB, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 86(5A), 444, 2008
  21. Atmakidis T, Kenig EY, Chem. Eng. J., 155(1-2), 404, 2009
  22. Reddy RK, Joshi JB, Particuology., 8, 37, 2010
  23. Suekane T, Yokouchi Y, Hirai S, AIChE J., 49(1), 10, 2003
  24. Dybbs A, Edwards RV, fundamentals of transport phenomena in porous media, Bear J, Corapcioglu M, Eds., Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 201, 1984
  25. Dixon AG, Nijemeisland M, Stitt EH, Adv. Chem. Eng., 31, 307, 2006
  26. ANSYS FLUENT 12.0, User’s Guide, 12.6.2 Modeling Turbulence, ANSYS, Inc., 2009
  27. Ergun S, Chem. Eng. Prog., 48, 89, 1952
  28. Zhavoronkov NM, Aerov ME, Umnik NN, J. Phys. Chem., 23, 342, 1949
  29. Reichelt W, Chem. Ing. Tech., 44, 1068, 1972
  30. Yagi S, Wakao N, AIChE J., 5, 79, 1959
  31. Li CH, Finlayson BA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 32, 1055, 1977
  32. Dixon AG, LaBua LA, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer., 28, 879, 1985
  33. Demirel Y, Sharma RN, Al-Ali HH, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 43(2), 327, 2000