Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.4, 1110-1119, 2011
Solvent-gradient SMB to separate o-xylene and p-xylene
In batch chromatography, solvent-gradient operations (SG) produce significant improvement in terms of the enrichment of products and the separation time and the solvent consumption as compared with isocratic operations. This work studied solvent-gradient operation in reversed-phase simulated moving bed unit to separate ortho-xylene and para-xylene. In a solvent-gradient mode, different mobile phase compositions lead to a different retention behavior of solutes, i.e., different adsorption isotherms. Frontal analysis experiments for ortho-xylene and para-xylene were carried out with a reversed-phase column to measure adsorption parameters at several different mobile phase compositions, such as 45%, 50%, 60%, 75% and 90% acetonitrile. Therefore, the parameters in the retention model for solvent-gradient operation in the case of reversed-phase chromatography were estimated and applied to the design of an SMB system. A modified design method for solvent-gradient simulated moving bed chromatography (SG-SMB) was proposed. The robust operating conditions were obtained within the separation region on (φR, φE) plane (φR and φE are the volumetric content of organic modifier in the raffinate and the extract streams, respectively). The performance results of isocratic and solvent-gradient SMB were compared. A partial-discard strategy and increasing of the solvent gradient level were also applied to improve the performance of the SG-SMB.
[References]
  1. Broughton DB, Gerhold CG, U.S. Patent, 2,985,589, 1961
  2. Pais LS, Loureiro JM, Rodrigues AE, J. Chromatogr. A., 827, 215, 1998
  3. Azevedo DCS, Rodrigues AE, AIChE J., 47(9), 2042, 2001
  4. Juza M, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, J. Trends Biotechnol., 18, 108, 2000
  5. Schulte M, Strube JP, J. Chromatogr. A., 906, 399, 2001
  6. Migliorini C, Wendlinger M, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(12), 2606, 2001
  7. Mazzotti M, Storti G, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A., 786, 309, 1997
  8. Abel S, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A., 944, 23, 2002
  9. Abel S, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A., 1026, 47, 2004
  10. Jensen TB, Reijns TGP, Billiet HAH, van der Wielen LAM, J. Chromatogr. A., 873, 149, 2000
  11. Antos D, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(23), 6667, 2001
  12. Antos D, Seidel-Morgenstern A, J. Chromatogr. A., 944, 77, 2002
  13. Ziomek G, Antos D, J. Chromatogr. A., 29, 1577, 2005
  14. Ziomek G, Kaspereit M, Jezowski J, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Antos D, J. Chromatogr. A., 1070, 111, 2005
  15. Storti G, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, Carra S, AIChE J., 39, 471, 1993
  16. Mazzotti M, Storti G, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A., 769, 3, 1997
  17. Jin CH, Lee JW, Row KH, J. Sep. Sci., 31, 23, 2008
  18. Lee JW, Row KH, J. Sep. Sci., 32, 221, 2009
  19. Guiochon G, Shirazi SG, Katti AM, Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1994
  20. Mihlbachler K, Kaczmarski K, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Guiochon G, J. Chromatogr. A., 955, 35, 2002
  21. Bae YS, Lee CH, J. Chromatogr. A., 1122, 161, 2006