Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.12, No.5, 567-571, 1995
CHARACTERISTICS COMPARISON BETWEEN PLASMID-HARBORING AND CHROMOSOME-INTEGRATED RECOMBINANT SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE CULTURES
It is important to understand the differences in characteristics between plasmid-harboring recombinant yeast and chromosome-integrated recombinant yeast for the design and optimization of bioprocess employing recombi-nant yeast. In the present study, heterologous glucoamylase gene was inserted into yeast. The glucoamylase activity per gene copy number of chromosome-integrated recombinant yeast MMY2SUCSTA-I-5 was 3 to 6 folds higher than that of plasmid-harboring recombinant yeast MMY2SUCSTA. And the genetic stability of chromosome-integrated recombinant yeast (99%) was far better compared to plasmid-harboring recombinant yeast (65%). Better genetic stability and glucoamylase activity per gene copy number of chromosome-integrated recombinant yeast can provide advantages in higher final expression level, especially in continuous culture, compared to the plasmid-harboring recombinant yeast. The optimal glucose concentration for maximum expression of glucoamylase in chromosome-integrated recombinant yeast was lower than that in plasmid-harboring recombinant yeast.
[References]
  1. Ahn JH, "Regulation of Glucoamylase Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. diastaticus,", Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National Univ., Seoul, Korea, 1994
  2. Barbotin JN, Sayadi S, Nasri M, Berry F, Thomas D, "Improvement of Plasmid Stability by Immobilization of Recombinant Microorganisms," Annals of the New york Academy of Science, 589, 41, 1990
  3. Birnboim HC, Doly J, Nucl. Acids Res., 7, 1513, 1979
  4. Blomqvist K, Suihko ML, Knoeles J, Penttila M, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 57, 2796, 1991
  5. Carlson M, Botstein D, Cell, 28, 145, 1982
  6. Cha HJ, Yoo YJ, Ahn JH, Kang HS, Biotechnol. Lett., 14, 747, 1992
  7. Chu FK, Maley F, J. Biol. Chem., 255, 6392, 1980
  8. DaSilva NA, Bailey JE, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 37, 318, 1991
  9. Fogel S, Welch JW, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79, 5342, 1982
  10. Hinnen A, Hicks JB, Fink GR, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 75, 1929, 1978
  11. Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A, J. Bacteriol., 153, 163, 1983
  12. Kingsman SM, Kingsman AJ, Mellor J, Trends Biotechnol., 5, 53, 1987
  13. Kushner SR, "An Improved Method with ColE1-Derived Plasmids," in Genetic Engineering (Eds. H.B. Boyer and S. Nicosia), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 17, 1978
  14. Marten MR, Seo JH, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 34, 1133, 1989
  15. Meacock PA, Cohan SN, Cell, 20, 529, 1980
  16. Rose MD, Methods Enzymol., 152, 481, 1987
  17. Sakai A, Shimizu Y, Hishinuma F, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 33, 302, 1990
  18. Seo JH, Bailey JE, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 27, 1668, 1985
  19. Siegel R, Ryu DY, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 27, 28, 1985
  20. Stockhaus J, Eckes P, Blau A, Schell J, Willmitzer L, Nucl. Acids Res., 15, 3479, 1987
  21. Summers DK, Sherratt DJ, Cell, 36, 1097, 1984
  22. Yamashita I, Suzuki K, Fukui S, J. Bacteriol., 161, 567, 1985