Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.3, 837-847, 2011
Discrete system identification and self-tuning control of dissolved oxygen concentration in a stirred reactor
This work presents the applications of discrete-time system identification and generalized minimum variance (GMV) control of dissolved oxygen (DO) level in a batch bioreactor in which Saccharomyces cerevisiae is produced at aerobic condition. Air flow rate and mixing rate were varied to determine the maximum local liquid phase volumetric mass transfer coefficient (KLa). Maximum KLa value was determined at a mixing rate of 600 rpm and air flow rate of 3.4 Lmin.1. For control purpose, manipulated variable was selected as air flow rate due to its effectiveness on the KLa. To examine the dynamic behavior of the bioreactor, various input signals were utilized as a forcing function and three different model orders were tested. A second0order controlled auto regressive moving average (CARMA) model was used as the process model in the control algorithm and in the system identification step. It is concluded that the ternary input is more suitable than the other input types used in this work for system identification. Recursive least squares method (RLS) was used to determine the model parameters. GMV control results were compared with the traditional PID control results by using performance criteria of IAE and ITAE for different types of DO set point trajectories. DO concentration in the batch bioreactor was controlled more successfully with an adaptive controller structure of GMV than the PID controller with fixed parameters.
[References]
  1. Astrom KJ, Wittenmark B, Automatica., 9, 185, 1973
  2. Clarke DW, Gawthrop PJ, Proc. IEE., 26(6), 633, 1979
  3. Omstead DR, Computer control of fermentation processes., CRC Press, Florida, 1990
  4. Shuler L, Karg F, Bioprocess engineering basic concepts., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1992
  5. Sales KR, Billings SA, Int. J. Control., 51, 753, 1990
  6. Svonoros S, Stephanopoulos G, Aris R, Int. J. Control., 34, 651, 1981
  7. Goodwin GC, McInnis B, Long RS, Optimal Control Applications and Methods., 3, 443, 1982
  8. Goodwin GC, Sin KS, Adaptive filtering prediction and control., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1984
  9. Omstead DR, Computer control of fermentation processes., CRC Press, Florida, 1990
  10. Clarke TA, Hesketh T, Seddon T, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 17, 1507, 1985
  11. Sargantanis IG, Karim MN, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 60(1), 1, 1998
  12. Lee SC, Hwang YB, Chang HN, Chang YK, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 37, 597, 1991
  13. Suzuki T, Yamane T, Shimizu S, J. Ferm. Technol., 64(4), 317, 1986
  14. Williams D, Yousefpour P, E. M. H., Biotechnol. Bioeng., 28, 631, 1986
  15. Soderstrom T, Stoica P, System identification., Prentice Hall Ltd., New York, 1989
  16. Wellstead PE, Zarrop MB, Self-tuning systems-control and signal processing., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1991
  17. Clarke DW, Gawthrop PJ, Proc. IEEE., 122(9), 929, 1975
  18. Karagoz AR, Hapoglu H, Alpbaz M, Chem. Eng. Process., 39(3), 253, 2000
  19. Ertunc S, Akay B, Bursali N, Hapoglu H, Alpbaz M, Food Bioprod. Process., 81, 327, 2003
  20. Ertunc S, Akay B, Boyacioglu H, Hapoglu H, Food Bioprod. Process., 87, 46, 2009
  21. Mohtadi C, Industrial Digital Control Systems “Chapter 7. Adaptive Control”: Warwick K and Rees D (Eds.), IEE Control Engineering Series 37, Institution of Engineering and Technology, London, 1988
  22. Stephanopoulos G, Chemical process control., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1984