Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.2, 511-518, 2011
Positive and negative effects of excessive water reuse to be considered in water network synthesis
Water network synthesis has focused on maximizing water reuse to minimize freshwater consumption, even though the adverse effect of water use has not been examined until now. This study evaluates and analyzes the positive and negative effects of excessive water reuse on the environmental and economic performance of a water network system. Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing are used to evaluate the environmental impacts and economic costs of the three water systems with the different levels of water reuse. Networking for low water reuse enhances both environmental and economic performance of a water system. However, networking for excessive water reuse deteriorates the economic performance of the water system, even though this networking enhances its environmental performance. Therefore, the positive and negative effects of excessive water reuse should be taken into account in developing new pinch analysis methodologies and mathematical optimization models for water network synthesis.
[References]
  1. Takama N, Kuriyama T, Shiroko K, Umeda T, Comput. Chem. Eng., 4, 251, 1980
  2. Quesada I, Grossmann IE, Comput. Chem. Eng., 19(12), 1219, 1995
  3. Alva-Argaez A, Kokossis A, Smith R, Comput. Chem. Eng., 22, S741, 1998
  4. Mann JG, Liu YA, Industrial water reuse and wastewater minimization., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999
  5. Bagajewicz M, Comput. Chem. Eng., 24(9-10), 2093, 2000
  6. Gunaratnam M, Alva-Argaez A, Kokossis A, Kim JK, Smith R, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(3), 588, 2005
  7. Prakotpol D, Srinophakun T, Chem. Eng. Process., 43(2), 203, 2004
  8. Wang YP, Smith R, Chem. Eng. Sci., 49(7), 981, 1994
  9. Wang YP, Smith R, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 73(Part A), 889, 1995
  10. Kuo WC, Smith R, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 76(Part A), 287, 1998
  11. Hallale N, Adv. Environ. Res., 6, 377, 2002
  12. El-Halwagi MM, Gabriel F, Harell D, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(19), 4319, 2003
  13. Erol P, Thoming J, J. Clean. Prod., 13, 1492, 2005
  14. Erol P, Thoming J, Comput. Chem. Eng., 30, 587, 2005
  15. Lim SR, Park D, Lee DS, Park JM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(22), 7710, 2006
  16. Lim SR, Park JM, AIChE J., 53(12), 3253, 2007
  17. Lim SR, Park D, Park JM, J. Chem. Eng., 144, 368, 2008
  18. Lim SR, Park D, Park JM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(21), 6936, 2007
  19. Lim SR, Park JM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(6), 1988, 2008
  20. GAMS, A User Guide; GAMS Development Corporation, Washington DC, 2005
  21. McGhee TJ, Water supply and sewerage, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991
  22. Korean Standards Information Center, http://www.standard.go.kr, 2008
  23. ISO, Environmental management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Framework, ISO 14040, 1997
  24. IKP and PE Europe GMBH, Gabi 4.0 Software, 2004
  25. Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Ecoinvent data version 1.2, 2005
  26. US EPA, An introduction to environmental accounting as a business management tool: Key concepts and terms, Washington DC, 1995
  27. US EPA, The lean and green supply chain managers to reduce costs and improve environmental performance, Washington DC, 2000
  28. Korea Price Information, Corp., The Price Information, 422, 2006
  29. Korea Price Information, Corp., The Cost Estimation, 2006
  30. Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991
  31. Korea National Statistical Office, http://www.nso.go.kr, 2006
  32. The Bank of Korea, http://www.bok.or.kr, 2006