Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.27, No.4, 1226-1232, 2010
Mixing parameters for an airlift bioreactor considering constant cross sectional area of riser to downcomer: Effect of sparging gas location
The effect of mode of sparging gas on the mixing parameters of an internal loop airlift bioreactor was investigated. Two bioreactors of identical volume of 14×10^(3) cm^(3) and the optimum riser to downcomer cross sectional area ratio of 0.6 were studied. In one bioreactor a gas sparger was located in the draft tube and in the annulus in another. Liquid mixing characteristics, i.e., mixing time and circulation time, were employed to describe the performance of the bioreactors. The tracer injection method was used to determine the mixing parameters. A mathematical modeling based on the tanks-in-series model was employed to characterize the hydrodynamics behavior of the bioreactors. Matlab 7.1 software was used to solve the model equations in the Laplace domain and determine the model parameter, the number of stages. A comparison between the simulation results and experimental data showed that the applied model can accurately describe the behavior of the bioreactors. The results showed that when the gas sparger was located in the draft tube, the liquid mixing time, circulation time, and the number of stage were less than while the gas sparger was located in annulus. This is due to more wall effects, more energy losses and pressure drop in the case of gas injection in the annulus.
[References]
  1. Jajuee B, Margaritis A, Karamanev D, Bergougnou MA, Chem. Eng. J., 125(2), 119, 2006
  2. Wang PM, Huang TK, Cheng HP, Chien YH, Wu WT, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 35(4), 354, 2002
  3. Zhang P, Yang M, Lu XP, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 15(2), 196, 2007
  4. Song HJ, Li H, Seo JH, Kim MJ, Kim SJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(1), 141, 2009
  5. Lee KB, Chun BH, Lee JC, Park CJ, Kim SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(1), 87, 2002
  6. Kim DJ, Ahn DH, Lee DI, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(1), 85, 2005
  7. Muthukumar K, Velan M, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 38(4), 253, 2005
  8. Lin TJ, Chen PC, J. Chem. Eng., 40, 69, 2005
  9. Park CJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(5), 694, 1999
  10. Zhang T, Wang J, Luo Z, Jin Y, J. Chem. Eng., 109, 115, 2005
  11. Freitas C, Teixeira JA, Bioprocess. Eng., 18, 267, 1998
  12. Fadavi A, Chisti Y, Chem. Eng. J., 131(1-3), 105, 2007
  13. Bando Y, Hayakawa H, Nishimura M, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 31(5), 765, 1998
  14. Pollard DJ, Ayazi Shamlou P, Lilly MD, Ison MP, Bioproc.Biosystems Eng. J., 15, 279, 1996
  15. Koide K, Horib K, Kitaguchi H, Suzuki N, J. Chem. Eng.Japan., 17, 547, 1984
  16. Weiland P, Ger. Chem. Eng., 7, 374, 1984
  17. Gavrilescu M, Tudose RZ, Chem. Eng. Process., 38(3), 225, 1999
  18. Levenspiel O, Chem. React. Eng., 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York,295, 1999
  19. Znad H, Bales V, Markos J, Kawase Y, Biochem. Eng. J., 21, 73, 2004
  20. Prokop A, Erickson LE, Fernandez J, Humphrey AE, Biotechnol.Bioeng., 11, 945, 1969
  21. Erickson LE, Lee SS, Fan LT, J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 22, 199, 1972
  22. Turner JR, Mills PL, Chem. Eng. Sci., 45, 2317, 1990
  23. Kanai T, Uzumaki T, Kawase Y, Comput. Chem. Eng., 20(9), 1089, 1996
  24. Choi KH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(4), 441, 1999
  25. Varedi Kolaei M, Karimzadeh R, Shojaosadati SA, Towfighi J, Iranian. J. Biotechnol., 5, 87, 2007
  26. Sikula I, Jurascik M, Markos J, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(18-20), 5216, 2007
  27. Blazej A, Kisa A, Markos J, Chem. Eng. Process., 43(12), 1519, 2004