Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.2, 569-575, 2009
Local resistance characteristics of highly concentrated coal-water slurry flow through fittings
The local resistance characteristics of high concentration coal-water slurry (CWS) flowing through three types of local fittings, namely the gradual contractions, sudden contractions and 90° horizontal elbows, were investigated at a transportation test facility. Results show that the local resistance loss of gradual contractions decreases as the contraction angle increases. When pipe diameter ratio varies little, local resistance loss of sudden contractions changes insignificantly. There is an optimal value of bend diameter ratio, at which the local resistance loss of horizontal elbows is the least. As Reynolds number increases, the resistance coefficients of all the three fittings first reduce and then stabilize, while the three pipes have different ratio of equivalent length to pipe diameter Le/D behaviors, that is, Le/D of the gradual contractions decreases gradually and then keeps stable; that of the sudden contractions diminishes at first and then increases, and that of the horizontal elbows increases linearly.
[References]
  1. Cen KF, Yao Q, Cao XY, Theory and application of combustion, flow, heat transfer, gasification of coal-water slurry, Zhe Jiang University, Publications, Hang Zhou, 1997
  2. Yu HL, Liu JZ, Fan XW, Proc. Chin. Soc. Electr. Eng., 26, 80, 2006
  3. Choi YC, Park TJ, Kim JH, Lee JG, Hong JC, Kim YG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(4), 493, 2001
  4. Sung DJ, Kang SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 41, 1, 1997
  5. Turian RM, Stabi1ity, rheology and flow in pipes, bends, fittings, valves and venturi meters of concentrated non-newtonian suspensions, Chicago, University of Illinois, 1987
  6. Etema SG, Int. Comm. Heat Mass. Transfer., 31, 763, 2004
  7. Edwards MF, Jadallah MSM, Smith R, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 1, 57, 1985
  8. Bandala-Rocha MR, Macedo RC, Ramirez Velez-Ruiz JF, Inf. Technol., 16, 73, 2005
  9. Polizelli MA, Menegalli FC, Telis VRN, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 20, 455, 2003
  10. Turian RM, Ma TW, Hsu FLG, Sung MDJ, Plackmann GW, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 24(2), 243, 1998
  11. Tarun KB, Sudip KD, Pet. Sci. Eng., 55, 156, 2007
  12. Telis-Romero J, Polizelli MA, Gabas AL, Telis VRN, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 83(2), 186, 2005
  13. Fester V, Mbiya B, Slatter P, Chem. Eng. J., in press., 2008
  14. Marn J, Ternik P, Fluid Dyn. Res., 38, 295, 2006
  15. Lee DR, Park S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(3), 277, 2001
  16. Dean WR, Philos. Mag., 20, 208, 1927
  17. Dean WR, Philos. Mag., 30, 673, 1928
  18. Rogers GFC, Mayhew YR, Int. J. Heat Mass. Transfer., 7, 1207, 1994
  19. Singh RP, Mishra PJ, Chem. Eng. Japan, 13, 275, 1980
  20. Chasik P, Lee LS, Hoon K, Int. J. Refrigeration, 30, 1168, 2007
  21. Boger DV, Gupta R, Tanner RI, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mec., 4, 239, 1978
  22. Spedding PL, Benard E, Crawford NM, Exp. Thermal. Fluid Sci., 32, 827, 2007
  23. Spedding PL, Benard E, Exp. Thermal. Fluid Sci., 31, 761, 2007
  24. Rosa S, Pinho FT, Int. J. Heat. Fluid Flow., 27, 319, 2006
  25. Hooper WB, Mcketta JJ, Encyclopedia of Chem. Pro. Des., 39, 19, 1991
  26. Nam SR, Dae HS, Fuel, 74, 1313, 1995
  27. Takami T, Sudou K, Tomita Y, Bull. JSME, 29, 3755, 1986
  28. Rathna SL, Proceedings of the fluid mechanical symposium, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 378, 1967