Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.2, 339-348, 2009
Evaluation of jet performance in drop-on-demand (DOD) inkjet printing
Abstract.Inkjet printing has been widely used in many applications and has been studied for many years. However, there are not many systematic researches on the mechanism of jet formation, nor is there any reliable platform that enables us to evaluate jet performance. In this study, an approach to practically evaluate the jet stability of the dropon-demand (DOD) inkjet printing has been proposed, based on which the transient behavior of the DOD drop formation has been studied experimentally for Newtonian liquids with a range of different viscosities (1.0-11 cp) but of a comparable surface tension. For more viscous liquids, the rate of the jet retraction after a pinch-off from the nozzle was found to increase as the thread motion became more sharp and conical as a result of the shape effect. The break-up time of the jet also increased because the rate of capillary wave propagation was lower for more viscous liquids. The jet stability graph, which can be drawn in terms of jet retraction and break-up time, was employed to characterize the jetting stability, and the degree of satellite drop generation was quantitatively evaluated by two critical jet speeds. The effect of an electric pulse imposed on a piezoelectric plate inside the printhead was also studied. The single-peak electric pulse was used in this experiment for simple analysis, and the jet speed variation was measured under different operating conditions. Both the optimal dwell time and the maximum stable jetting frequency were affected by viscosity and they were explained in terms of the propagation theory.
[References]
  1. de Gans BJ, Schubert US, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 24(11), 659, 2003
  2. Calvert P, Chem. Mater., 13, 3299, 2001
  3. Sirringhaus H, Kawase T, Friend RH, Shimoda T, Inbasekaran M, Wu W, Woo EP, Science, 290, 2123, 2000
  4. Kawase T, Sirringhaus H, Friend RH, Shimoda T, Adv. Mater., 13(21), 1601, 2001
  5. Szczech JB, Megaridis CM, Gamota DR, Zhang J, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 25, 26, 2005
  6. de Gans BJ, Duineveld PC, Schubert US, Adv. Mater., 16(3), 203, 2004
  7. Mun RP, Byars JA, Boger DV, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 74(1-3), 285, 1998
  8. Christanti Y, Walker LM, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 100(1-3), 9, 2001
  9. Christanti Y, Walker LM, J. Rheol., 46(3), 733, 2002
  10. Cooper-White JJ, Fagan JE, Tirtaatmadja V, Lester DR, Boger DV, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 106(1), 29, 2002
  11. Liou TM, Shih KC, Chan SW, Chen SC, Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer, 29, 1109, 2002
  12. Wu HC, Hwang WS, Lin HJ, Mater. Sci and Eng., A373, 268, 2004
  13. Wu HC, Hwang WS, Lin HJ, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 13, 2005
  14. Fromm JE, IBM J. Res., 28, 322, 1984
  15. Shin DY, Grassia P, Derby B, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 46, 181, 2004
  16. Shield TW, Bogy DB, Talke FE, IBM J. Res., 31, 96, 1987
  17. Bogy DB, Talke FE, IBM J. Res., 28, 307, 1984
  18. Wu HC, Shan TR, Hwang WS, Lin HJ, Mater. Transactions, 45, 1794, 2004
  19. Lee FC, Mills RN, Talke FE, IBM J. Res., 28, 307, 1984
  20. Carr WW, Morris JF, Nat. Textile Center Annual Report (2003)
  21. Carr WW, Park H, Bucknall D, Nat. Textile Center Annual Report (2005)
  22. Shore HJ, Harrison GM, Phys. Fluids, 17, 033104, 2005
  23. Dong H, Carr WW, Morris JF, Phys. Fluids, 18, 072102, 2006
  24. Talyer GI, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser, A253, 313, 1959
  25. Keller JB, Phys. Fluids, 26, 3451, 1983
  26. Culick FEC, J. Appl. Phys., 31, 1128, 1960
  27. Brenner MP, Gueyffier D, Phys. Fluids, 11, 737, 1999
  28. Eggers J, Rev. Mod. Phys., 69, 865, 1997