Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.25, No.6, 1407-1415, 2008
Performance control of asymmetric poly(phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone) ultrafiltration membrane using gelation
We studied the influence of the gelation conditions on the formation kinetics of the polyphthalazine ether sulfone ketone (PPESK) membrane via wet phase inversion process experimentally and theoretically. Membrane formation and its morphology were first observed with an online optical microscope - CCD camera system. The resulting membranes prepared under various gelation conditions were then characterized by the gelation parameter, optical microscope, and SEM. Lastly, the relationship between the final membrane structure/permeation properties and the gelation parameter was discussed extensively. The results showed that both the gelation rate and the membrane flux increased dramatically as the gelation temperature increased. Moreover, the membrane structures became loose, and the porosity of membrane increased. Different non-solvent could change the solubility parameter between the polymer and the non-solvent, and thus the gelation rate greatly. With the increasing number of carbons in non-solvent, the gelation rate became slow, and the membrane gradually changed from a finger structure into a sponge structure. Adding NMP into the non-solvent changed the difference in the chemical potential and the solubility parameter between the polymer solution and the non-solvent, which in turn changed the gelation rate of polymer solution greatly. With the increasing concentration of NMP in non-solvent, the gelation rate became very slow and sponge structures formed with the non-solvent system of 80% NMP. A novel conclusion could be made that we could control the flux and reject of membrane just by changing the mean diffusion coefficient of skin, D, and the diffusion coefficient of skin, D1, in the process of membrane formation.
[References]
  1. Loeb S, Sourirajan S, Advances in Chemistry Series, 38, 117, 1963
  2. Jian XG, Dai Y, Zeng L, Xu RX, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 71(14), 2385, 1998
  3. Meng YZ, Hay AS, Jian XG, Tjong SC, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 66(8), 1425, 1997
  4. Jian XG, Dai Y, He GH, Chen GH, J. Membr. Sci., 161(1-2), 185, 1999
  5. Strathmann H, Kock K, Desalination, 21, 241, 1977
  6. Strathmann H, Kock K, Amar P, Baker RW, Desalination, 14, 179, 1975
  7. Young TH, Chen LW, J. Membr. Sci., 83, 153, 1993
  8. Kang YS, Kim HJ, Kim UY, J. Membr. Sci., 60, 219, 1991
  9. Kim HJ, Tyagi RK, Fouda AE, Jonasson K, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 62(4), 621, 1996
  10. Qin PY, Chen CX, Han BB, Takuji S, Li JD, Sun BH, J. Membr. Sci., 268(2), 181, 2006
  11. So MT, Eirich FR, Strathmann H, Baker RW, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Lett. Ed., 11, 201, 1973
  12. Reuvers AJ, Altena FW, Smolders CA, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 24, 793, 1986
  13. Cohen C, Tanny GB, Prager S, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 17, 477, 1979
  14. Yao CW, Burford RP, Fane AG, Fell CJD, J. Membr. Sci., 38, 113, 1988
  15. Frommer MA, Messalem RM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 12, 328, 1973
  16. Wijmanns JG, Kant J, Mulder MHV, Smolders CA, Polymer, 26, 1539, 1985
  17. Lue SJ, Shih TS, Wei TC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23(3), 441, 2006
  18. Strathmann H, in Material Science of Synthetic Membranes, Lloyd DR, Ed., ACS Symposium Series 269, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (1985)
  19. Reuvers AJ, van den Berg JWA, Smolders CA, J. Membr. Sci., 34, 45, 1987
  20. Reuvers AJ, Smolders CA, J. Membr. Sci., 34, 67, 1987
  21. Yilmaz L, McHugh AJ, J. Membr. Sci., 28, 287, 1986
  22. Yilmaz L, McHugh AJ, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 35, 1967, 1988
  23. Radovanovic P, Thiel SW, Hwang ST, J. Membr. Sci., 65, 231, 1992