Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.25, No.4, 897-904, 2008
Effect of pressure fluctuations on the heat transfer characteristics in a pressurized slurry bubble column
The hydrodynamics and heat transfer characteristics were investigated in a slurry bubble column reactor whose diameter was 0.0508 m (ID) and 1.5 m in height. Effects of gas velocity (0.025-0.1 m/s), pressure (0.1-0.7MPa), solid concentration (0-20 vol%) and liquid viscosity (1.0-38.0 mPa s) on the hydrodynamics and heat transfer characteristics were examined. The pressure difference fluctuations were analyzed by means of attractor trajectories and correlation dimension to characterize the hydrodynamic behavior in the column. The gas holdup increased with increasing gas velocity or pressure, but decreased with increasing solid concentration or liquid viscosity. It was found that the attractor trajectories and correlation dimension of pressure fluctuations were effective tools to describe the hydrodynamic behaviors in the slurry bubble column. The heat transfer coefficient increased with increasing pressure or gas velocity, but decreased with increasing solid concentration or viscosity of slurry phase in the slurry bubble column. The heat transfer coefficient value was well correlated in terms of operating variables and correlation dimension of pressure fluctuations in the slurry bubble column.
[References]
  1. Shah YT, Kelkar BG, Godbole SP, Deckwer WD, AIChE J., 28, 353, 1982
  2. Fan LS, Gas-liquid-solid fluidization engineering, Butterworth Publishers, Stoneham, MA, USA, 1989
  3. Krishna R, Sie ST, Fuel Process. Technol., 64(1-3), 73, 2000
  4. Zhang K, Song HS, Sun DK, Fuel, 82, 233, 2003
  5. Deckwer WD, Bubble column reactors, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1992
  6. Shin KS, Song PS, Lee CG, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kim SD, Kim SJ, AIChE J., 51(2), 671, 2005
  7. Inga JR, Morsi BI, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(3), 928, 1999
  8. Yang GQ, Luo X, Lau R, Fan LS, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(7), 2568, 2000
  9. Li H, Prakash A, Margaritis A, Bergougnou MA, Powder Technol., 133(1-3), 171, 2003
  10. Kang Y, Cho YJ, Woo KJ, Kim KI, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 55(2), 411, 2000
  11. Packard NH, Crutchfield JP, Farmer JD, Shaw RS, Phys. Rev. Lett., 45, 712, 1980
  12. Roux JC, Physica D, 8, 257, 1983
  13. Grassberger P, Procaccia I, Physica D, 9, 189, 1983
  14. Abraham NB, Albano AM, Das B, De Guzman G, Yong S, Gioggia RS, Puccioni GP, Tredicce JR, Phys. Lett., 114A, 217, 1986
  15. Park YS, Son JE, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 31(3), 287, 1993
  16. Jordan U, Saxena AK, Schumpe A, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 81, 491, 2003
  17. Wilkinson PM, van Dierendonck LL, Chem. Eng. Sci., 45, 2309, 1990
  18. Woo KJ, Cho YJ, Kim KI, Kang Y, Kim SD, J. KICHE, 36, 937, 1998
  19. Kang Y, Cho YJ, Woo KJ, Kim SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(21), 4887, 1999
  20. Son SM, Song PS, Lee CG, Kang SH, Kang Y, Kusakabe K, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 37, 990, 2004
  21. Zuber M, Findly JA, J. Heat Transf., 87, 453, 1965
  22. Clark NN, Flemmer RL, AIChE J., 31, 500, 1985
  23. Kang Y, Shin JS, Cho SH, Choi MJ, Lee KW, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 63, 313, 1995
  24. Lin TJ, Fan LS, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(21), 4853, 1999
  25. Kumar S, Fan LS, AIChE J., 40(5), 745, 1994
  26. Muller K, Dissertation, TU Berlin, 1958
  27. Martins J, Dissertation, TU Berlin, 1959
  28. Deckwer WD, Louisi Y, Zaida A, Ralek M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 19, 198, 1980