Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.25, No.4, 727-731, 2008
Electrochemical inactivation of coliforms by in-situ generated hydroxyl radicals
Electrochemical disinfection is quite attractive as a promising alternative technology to chlorination. It is still debated whether conventional electrochemical disinfection, which electrolyzes the solution with very high chloride concentration to produce excess amounts of chlorine species, will generate toxic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) and have the same health risks as chlorination. To resolve this critical issue, we explored the possibility of electrochemical disinfection based on electrogenerated free radicals but not on active chlorine. The germicidal efficiency of 99.99% was achieved with a contact time of 5 min and current density of 7 mA cm.2 for a chloride-free model wastewater contaminated by coliforms. Electron spin resonance detection clearly confirmed that hydroxyl radicals were the major germicidal species responsible for efficient electrochemical disinfection. This process would not generate poisonous DBPs due to the avoidance of dangerous chlorine species. pH in the range of 5-9 has little effect on the bacteria inactivation. Formation mechanism of hydroxyl radicals was discussed.
[References]
  1. Zhang X, Minear RA, Barrett SE, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 963, 2005
  2. Lee YJ, Kim HT, Lee UG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(3), 647, 2004
  3. Rennecker JL, Kim JH, Corona-Vasquez B, Marinas BJ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2752, 2001
  4. Chai YS, Lee JC, Kim BW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(6), 633, 2000
  5. Karnik BS, Davies SH, Baumann MJ, Masten SJ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 7656, 2005
  6. Cho M, Chung H, Yoon J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2134, 2003
  7. White GC, Handbook of chlorination and alternative disinfectants, 4th Ed., Publications, Wiley, New York, 637, 1999
  8. Chun CL, Hozalski RM, Arnold WA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8525, 2005
  9. Blatchley III ER, Margetas D, Duggirala R, Water Res., 37, 4385, 2003
  10. WHO, Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd Edition, Volume 1 Recommendations, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1993
  11. Environmental Protection Agency, Disinfectants, disinfection byproducts, final rule-national primary drinking water regulations, Federal Register, 63, 69390, 1998
  12. Bergmann H, Iourtchouk T, Schops K, Bouzek K, Chem. Eng. J., 85(2-3), 111, 2002
  13. Kerwick MI, Reddy SM, Chamberlain AHL, Holt DM, Electrochim. Acta, 50(25-26), 5270, 2005
  14. Diao HF, Li XY, Gu JD, Shi HC, Xie ZM, Process Biochem., 39, 1421, 2004
  15. Kraft A, Blaschke M, Kreysig D, J. Appl. Electrochem., 32(6), 597, 2002
  16. Matsunaga T, Okochi M, Takahashi M, Nakayama T, Wake H, Nakamura N, Water Res., 34, 3117, 2000
  17. Oturan MA, J. Appl. Electrochem., 30(4), 475, 2000
  18. Li XY, Ding F, Lo PSY, Sin HPS, J. Environ. Eng., 128, 697, 2002
  19. Wu ZC, Zhou MH, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2698, 2001
  20. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), Methods for the determination of organic compounds in drinking water: Supplement I, EPA-600/4-90/020, Cincinnati, 1990
  21. Cong YQ, Wu ZC, Ye Q, Tan T, J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci., 5, 180, 2004
  22. Wu Z, Cong Y, Zhou M, Ye Q, Tan T, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(5), 866, 2002
  23. Cong YQ, Wu ZC, J. Phys. Chem., 111, 3442, 2007
  24. Popovic ND, Johnson DC, Anal. Chem., 70, 468, 1998
  25. Kraft A, Stadelmann M, Blaschke M, Kreysig D, Sandt B, Schroder F, Rennau J, J. Appl. Electrochem., 29(7), 861, 1999
  26. Stan SD, Daeschel MA, J. Agric. Food Chem., 53, 4906, 2005