Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.25, No.2, 209-216, 2008
Counter-current flow limitation velocity measured in annular narrow gaps formed between large diameter concentric pipes
A two-phase flow configuration in which the gas phase flows upwards while the liquid phase flows downwards is referred to as a counter-current flow pattern. This flow configuration cannot be preserved if any flow rate exceeds a criterion known as the counter-current flow limitation (CCFL) or flooding. Since the CCFL is important to chemical engineers, it has long been studied via experimental and analytical approaches. Most of the previous CCFL experiments in annular channels have been carried out with a small diameter annulus and large gap-to-diameter ratio annulus. The present experiment examines the CCFL in narrow annular channels having gap sizes of 1, 2, 3, and 5 mm. The outer diameter of the annular passage is 500 mm. At a gap size of 1 mm, it was visually observed that a CCFL locally occurred in some region of the periphery while the other region remained in a counter-current flow configuration. The region under partial CCFL condition expanded with an increase in the air flow rate, finally reaching a global CCFL. The air flow rate for the global CCFL was roughly 15% larger than that for initiation of a partial CCFL. This difference in air flow rate between the initiation of a partial CCFL and the global CCFL was reduced as the gap size increased. When the gap size was 5 mm, the partial CCFL was not observed, but onset of flooding led to a global CCFL. Because of the existence of a transient period, the CCFL was experimentally defined as the situation where net water accumulation is sustained. The measured CCFL data are presented in the form of a Wallis’ type correlation. Two length scales, hydraulic diameter and average circumference, were examined as the characteristic length scale. The average circumference appeared to better fit the experimental data, including results reported elsewhere. A new correlation using the average circumference as the characteristic length scale is suggested based on the experimental measurements of the present work and previous reports.
[References]
  1. Imura H, Kusuda H, Funatsu S, Chem. Eng. Sci., 32, 79, 1977
  2. Han DH, Hong WH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(3), 324, 1998
  3. Cho SY, Lee YY, Kim SJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 12(3), 313, 1995
  4. Mayinger F, Weiss P, Wolfert K, Nucl. Eng. Des., 145, 47, 1993
  5. Lee SC, Mo C, Nam SC, Lee JY, Thermal-hydraulic behaviours and flooding of ECC in DVI systems, KAERI/CM-045/95, KAERI, 1995
  6. Cheng LY, Counter-current flow limitation in thin rectangular channels, BNL-44836, BNL, 1990
  7. Mishima K, Nishihara H, Nucl. Eng. Des., 86, 165, 1985
  8. Sudo Y, Kaminaga M, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 15, 755, 1989
  9. Jeong JH, Lee SJ, Park RJ, Kim SB, J. of Korean Nuclear Society, 34(4), 396, 2002
  10. Celata GP, Farello GE, Furrer M, Cumo M, Flooding experiments in a rectangular geometry, RT/TERM/85/3, ENEA, 1985
  11. Osakabe M, Kawasaki Y, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 15, 747, 1989
  12. Ruggles AE, Countercurrent flow limited heat flux in the high flux isotope reactor (HFIR) fuel element, ORNL/TM-9662, ORNL, 1990
  13. Mishima K, Boiling burnout at low flow rate and low pressure conditions, Ph.D. Thesis, Kyoto Univ., 1984
  14. Lee SY, Nuclear Technology, 104, 64, 1993
  15. Richter HJ, Wallis GB, Speers MS, Effect of scale on twophase countercurrent flow flooding, NUREG/CR-0312, NRC, 1979
  16. Koizumi Y, Nishida H, Ohtake H, Miyashita T, Proceedings of NURETH-8, 1, 48, 1997
  17. Ragland WA, Minkowycz WJ, France DM, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 10(2), 103, 1989
  18. Richter HJ, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 7, 647, 1981
  19. Nakamura H, Koizumi Y, Anoda Y, Tasaka K, Proceedings of 27th National Heat Transfer Symposium of Japan, 964, 1990
  20. Glaeser H, Nucl. Eng. Des., 133, 259, 1992
  21. McQuillan KW, Whalley PB, Hewitt GF, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 11(6), 741, 1985
  22. Roesler S, Groll M, Proc. of 1991 National Heat Transfer Conference, Minnesota, 91, 1991
  23. Ueda T, Suzuki S, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 4, 157, 1978
  24. Jeong JH, Park RJ, Kim SB, Heat Mass Transf., 34, 321, 1998
  25. Osakabe M, Futamata H, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 22(5), 883, 1996