Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.25, No.1, 139-143, 2008
Effects of nitrogen sources on toluene degradation by Pseudomonas putida BZ918
For effective toluene degradation, the effects of a nitrogen source were studied with Pseudomonas putida BZ912, which was isolated from crude oil contaminated soil and is capable of degrading VOC. Two nitrogen sources, ammonia and nitrate, showed different effects on specific growth rates (0.25 hr.1 and 0.12 hr.1, respectively), biomass yields (0.56 vs. 0.39) and specific toluene degradation rates (0.51 hr.1 vs. 0.26 hr.1). Under the resting cell conditions, the cells pre-cultured in the ammonia-containing medium showed higher specific toluene degradation rate than that in nitrate-containing medium (0.045 hr.1 vs. 0.038 hr.1). Ammonia as a nitrogen source was effective for degradation in high toluene concentration because high cellular biomass was accomplished. Nitrate showed slow growth rate compared to ammonia. The resting cell conditions demonstrated that it was able to degrade toluene efficiently without increasing biomass. These conditions could be a solution for degrading VOC after high cellular biomass was obtained in a biofilter. By changing the nitrogen source and the growth conditions according to the toluene concentration, the control of cell biomass and the desired removal capacity were accomplished.
[References]
  1. Yeom SH, Daugulis AJ, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 72, 156, 2000
  2. Rittmann BE, McCarty PL, Environmental biotechnology: Principles and applications, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 721-722, 2001
  3. Hodge DS, Devinny JS, J. Enrion. Eng., 121, 21, 1995
  4. Park HS, Final reports of service research: Development of a guiding principle in estimating discharges of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Ministry of Environment, Korea, 2003
  5. Campbell HJ, Connor MA, Proceedings for the Environmental Biotechnology, 1, 279, 1996
  6. Jung IG, Park OH, Woo HJ, Park CH, Biotechnol. Bioproc. Eng., 10, 34, 2005
  7. Cox HHJ, Deshusses MA, Water Res., 33, 2383, 1999
  8. Weber FJ, Hartmans S, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 50(1), 91, 1996
  9. Yeom SH, Yoo YJ, Process Biochem., 34(3), 281, 1999
  10. Clesceri LS, Greengerg AE, Trussell RR, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 17th ed., American Public Health Association, pp. 120-121, 1989
  11. Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Paker J, Biology of microorganisms, 9th ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 102-133, 2000
  12. Schonduve P, Sara M, Friedl A, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 45(1-2), 286, 1996
  13. Rojas A, Duque E, Mosqueda G, Golden G, Hurtado A, Ramos JL, Segura A, J. Bacteriol., 183, 3967, 2001
  14. Shareefdeen Z, Baltzis BC, Chem. Eng. Sci., 49(24), 4347, 1994
  15. Tang HM, Hwang SJ, Hwang SC, Hazard. Waste. Hazard. Mater., 12, 207, 1995
  16. Kiared K, Fundenberger B, Brzezinski R, Viel G, Heitz M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(11), 4719, 1997
  17. Yeom SH, Process Biochem., 42, 554, 2007
  18. Stanley NR, Lazazzera BA, Mol. Microbiol., 52, 917, 2004