Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.23, No.2, 271-278, 2006
Flotation efficiency of activated sludge flocs using population balance modelin dissolved air flotation
The activated sludge process is one of the most frequently used processes for biological wastewater treat-ment. Conventional gravity sedimentation (CGS), which is widely used as a secondary clarifier in activated sludgeprocesses, has a routine problem due to floating tendency, called bulking, caused by filamentous microorganisms. Dis-solved air flotation (DAF) has been applied as potential alternative to CGS as a secondary clarifier. A series of ex-periments were performed to measure physico-chemical characteristics and removal efficiency of activated sludge flocs.The removal efficiency of flocs corresponding in lag and exponential growth phases was lower, while that of flocs bothin stationary and endogenous phases considerably increased. The rise velocity of floc/bubble agglomerates was cal-culated by using a population balance (PB) model explaining the distribution of floc/bubble agglomerates. The ex-perimental results of flotation efficiency showed a similar tendency with the results predicted by PB model for the risevelocity and distribution of floc/bubble agglomerates. It was found from our study that the DAF process was very effec-tive as a secondary clarifier in the activated sludge process.
[References]
  1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation (APHA-AWWAWPCF), Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed., Washington, DC, 1998
  2. Bourgeois JC, Walsh ME, Gagnon GA, Water Res., 38, 1173, 2004
  3. Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME, Bubbles, drops, and particles, Academic Press, New York, 1978
  4. Edzwald JK, Water Sci. Technol., 31(3-4), 1, 1995
  5. Fukushi K, Tambo N, Matsui Y, Water Sci. Technol., 31(3-4), 37, 1995
  6. Kalinske AA, Evans RR, Comparison of flotation and sedimentation in treatment of industrial wastes, Proceeding of Industrial Waste Conference 8th, pp. 64-71, 1953
  7. Kwak DH, Jung HJ, Kim SJ, Won CH, Lee JW, Sep. Sci. Technol., 40(14), 3001, 2005
  8. Lee JE, Choi WS, Lee JK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 942, 2003
  9. Lee JM, Biochemical engineering, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 2nd ed., 1992
  10. Lee JW, Jung HJ, Kwak DH, Chung PJ, Water Res., 39, 617, 2005
  11. Lee JW, Yang TH, Jung HJ, Kim SJ, Kwak DH, Water Res., submitted, 2005
  12. Lee MG, Hano T, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(2), 178, 2001
  13. Leppinen DM, Dalziel SB, Linden PF, Water Sci. Technol., 43(8), 159, 2001
  14. Leppinen DM, Dalziel SB, J. Wat. Suppl: Res. & Tech.-AQUA, 53(8), 531, 2004
  15. Liers S, Baeyens J, Mochtar I, Water Environ. Res., 68(6), 1061, 1996
  16. Matsui Y, Fukushi K, Tambo N, J. Wat. Suppl: Res. & Tech.-AQUA, 47, 9, 1998
  17. Martins AMP, Pagilla K, Heijnen JJ, Loosdrecht MCM, Water Res., 38, 793, 2004
  18. Reid RC, Prausnitz JM, Poling BE, The properties of gases and liquids, McGraw-Hill, 4th ed., 1987
  19. Rodrigues RT, Rubio J, Miner. Eng., 16, 757, 2003
  20. Tambo N, Fukushi K, J. JWWA, 606, 22, 1985
  21. Tambo N, Fukushi K, Matsui Y, J. JWWA, 610, 2, 1985
  22. Vlyssides AG, Mai ST, Barampouti EMP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(11), 2775, 2004
  23. Zabel T, J. AWWA, 77(5), 42, 1985