Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.21, No.6, 1183-1192, 2004
Comparison of the Adsorption Dynamics of Air on Zeolite 5A and Carbon Molecular Sieve Beds
Adsorption and desorption in zeolite 5A and CMS beds were compared by using a ternary mixture (N2/O2/Ar; 78 : 21 : 1 vol%). Because the breakthrough curves for both beds show a tail by temperature variance, a nonisothermal mathematical model was applied to the simulation of adsorption dynamics. The LDF model with a constant rate parameter was enough to predict the experimental breakthrough and temperature curves of an equilibrium separation bed, while the modified LDF model with a concentration-dependent parameter should be applied to a kinetic separation bed. In the CMS bed initially saturated with He, Ar was the first breakthrough component with N2 following after a short interval. Then, after a long interval, the breakthrough of O2 occurred with a broad roll-up due to its fast diffusion rate and the relatively slow diffusion rate of N2. In the CMS bed initially saturated with O2, the breakthrough curves of O2 and N2 showed a very broad shape because of the slow diffusion of N2 into CMS. In the zeolite 5A bed, the breakthrough time sequence was Ar, O2, and N2 at very close time intervals. After the sharp roll-ups of O2 and Ar, the variation of the breakthrough curves was negligible. The inflection of the temperature profile in the zeolite 5A bed was caused by the crossover of the O2 and N2 MTZs, while in the CMS bed it was caused by the difference in the diffusion rates of O2 and N2.
[References]
  1. Ahn H, Yang J, Lee CH, Adsorption, 7, 339, 2001
  2. Ahn H, Yoo HK, Shul Y, Hyun S, Lee CH, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 35(4), 334, 2002
  3. Bae Y, Lee CH, Carbon, 43, 95, 2004
  4. Bae YS, Moon JH, Ahn H, Lee CH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(3), 712, 2004
  5. Budner Z, Dula J, Podstawa W, Gawdzik A, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 77(5), 405, 1999
  6. Chen YD, Yang RT, Uawithya P, AIChE J., 40(4), 577, 1994
  7. CHLENDI M, TONDEUR D, Gas Sep. Purif., 9(4), 231, 1995
  8. Choi WK, Kwon TI, Yeo YK, Lee H, Song HK, Na BK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(4), 617, 2003
  9. Do DD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 51(17), 4145, 1996
  10. Farooq S, Rathor MN, Hidajat K, Chem. Eng. Sci., 48, 4129, 1993
  11. Hayashi S, Kawai M, Kaneko T, Gas Sep. Purif., 10(1), 19, 1996
  12. Huang CC, Fair JR, AIChE J., 34, 1861, 1988
  13. Jee JG, Kim MB, Lee CH, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(3), 2004
  14. Jee JG, Lee JS, Lee CH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(16), 3647, 2001
  15. Jee JG, Park MK, Yoo HK, Lee K, Lee CH, Sep. Sci. Technol., 37(15), 3465, 2002
  16. Jee JG, Park HJ, Haam SJ, Lee CH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41(17), 4383, 2002
  17. Kim MB, Moon JH, Lee CH, Ahn H, Cho W, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(3), 703, 2004
  18. Kim SJ, Cho SY, Kim TY, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(1), 61, 2002
  19. Mendes AMM, Costa CAV, Rodrigues AE, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(1), 138, 2000
  20. Miller GW, Knaebel KS, Ikels KG, AIChE J., 33, 194, 1987
  21. Park CJ, Kim SS, Chun BH, Kim SH, Doh DS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(5), 833, 2002
  22. Park IS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(6), 1001, 2002
  23. Rege SU, Yang RT, Adsorption, 6, 15, 2000
  24. Rota R, Wankat PC, AIChE J., 36, 1299, 1990
  25. Ruthven DM, Raghavan NS, Hassan MM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 41, 1325, 1986
  26. Ruthven DM, "Pressure Swing Adsorption," VCH Publishers, 1994
  27. Sircar S, Hanley BF, Sep. Sci. Technol., 28(17), 2553, 1993
  28. Sorial GA, Granville WH, Daly WO, Chem. Eng. Sci., 38, 1517, 1983
  29. Yang JY, Lee CH, AIChE J., 44(6), 1325, 1998
  30. Yang J, Park MW, Chang JW, Ko SM, Lee CH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(2), 211, 1998
  31. Yang RT, "Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes," Butterworths Publishers, 1987