Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.21, No.5, 1044-1052, 2004
Effect of Powdered Activated Carbon Type on the Performance of an Adsorption-Microfiltration Submerged Hollow Fiber Membrane Hybrid System
This study highlights the importance of the type of powdered activated carbon (PAC) on the performance of an adsorption-MF hollow fiber membrane hybrid system. Submerged UF hollow fiber membrane with pore size of 0.4 μm was used along with the PAC in a single reaction thank to treat the wastewater. This procedure is different from the commonly adopted practice of having adsorption with PAC as a pretreatment step to membrane operation. This system is helpful in containing the PAC within one system, allows certain vaiation in feed characteristics and improves the effciency of the hybrid system. The overall performance of the membrane hybrid system was evaluted based on TOC removal, UV254 absorbance, turbidity removal and flux development. It is important to select a right PAC type to be used in the hybrid system in order to minimize the PAC dose and to enhance the performance. The adsorption capacity of the activated carbon had a greater influence on overall performance of the hybrid system than other physical properties of the PACs and must be given greater consideration when selecting the PAC for the membrane hybrid system. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) analysis of the cake deposit over the membrane helps to support the reason for moderate retention of organics.
[References]
  1. Abdessemed D, Nezzal G, Ben Aim R, Desalination, 131(1-3), 307, 2000
  2. Adham SS, Snoeyink VL, Clark MM, Bersillon JL, J. AWWA, 83, 81, 1991
  3. Anselme C, Charles P, "The Use of Powdered Activated Carbon for the Removal of Specific Pollutants in Ultrafiltration Processes," Laboratoire Central, Lyon-naise des Eaux, Le Pecq, France, 1990
  4. APHA, "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste-water," 20th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 1998
  5. Bansal RC, Donnet JB, Stoeckli F, "Active Carbon," Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1998
  6. Crozes G, Anselme C, Mallevialle J, J. Membr. Sci., 84, 61, 1993
  7. Edzwald JK, Becker WC, Wattier KL, J. AWWA, 77, 4, 1985
  8. Gere AR, J. AWWA, 89, 40, 1997
  9. Iritani E, Mukai Y, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 14(5), 347, 1997
  10. Jacangelo JG, Laine JM, Cummings EW, Adham SS, J. AWWA, 87, 100, 1995
  11. Jung CW, Kang LS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 855, 2003
  12. Kaiya Y, Itoh Y, Fujita K, Takizawa S, Desalination, 106, 71, 1996
  13. Kim IH, Chang HN, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 1(1), 21, 1984
  14. Kim JS, Lee SJ, Yoon SH, Lee CH, Water Sci. Technol., 34, 223, 1996
  15. Konieczny K, Klomfas G, Desalination, 147(1-3), 109, 2002
  16. Laine JM, Hagstrom JP, Clark MM, Mallevialle J, J. AWWA, 81, 61, 1989
  17. Laine JM, Vial D, Moulart P, Desalination, 131(1-3), 17, 2000
  18. Lin CF, Liu SH, Hao OJ, Water Res., 35, 2395, 2001
  19. Lin CF, Huang YJ, Hao OJ, Water Res., 33, 1252, 1999
  20. McKay G, "Use of Adsorbents for the Removal of Pollutants from Wastewater," CRC Press, Ind., USA, 1996
  21. Nystrom M, Ruohomaki K, Kaipia L, Desalination, 106, 79, 1996
  22. Schafer A, "Natural Organics Removal Using Membranes," Doctoral Dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia, 1999
  23. Thiruvenkatachari R, Shim WG, Lee JW, Moon H, "Application of Membrane Hybrid System for the Treatment of Domestic Wastewater in South Korea," Water Environment-Membrane Technology [WEMT2004], IWA Specialty Conference, Korea, 1199, 2004
  24. Tien C, "Adsorption Calculations and Modelling," Butterworth-Heinemann Publishers, USA, 1994
  25. Tomaszewska M, Mozia S, Water Res., 36, 4137, 2002
  26. Turcaud LV, Wiesner MR, Bottero JY, J. Membr. Sci., 52, 173, 1990
  27. Vickers JC, Thompson MA, Kelkar UG, Desalination, 102, 57, 1995
  28. Wiesner MR, Hackney J, Sethi S, Jacangelo JG, Laine JM, J. AWWA, 86, 33, 1994
  29. Yiantsios SG, Karabelas A, Desalination, 140(2), 195, 2001