Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.19, No.6, 986-991, 2002
Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Debinding in Metal Injection Molding (MIM) Process
The conventional debinding process in metal injection molding (MIM) is critical, environmentally unfriendly and time consuming. On the other hand, supercritical debinding is thought to be an effective method appropriate for eliminating the aforementioned inconvenience in the prior art. In this paper, supercritical debinding is compared with the conventional wicking debinding process. The binder removal rates in supercritical CO2 have been measured at 333.15 K, 348.15 K, and 358.15 K in the pressure range from 20 MPa to 28 MPa. After sintering, the surface of the silver bodies were observed by using SEM. When the supercritical CO2 debinding was carried out at 348.15 K, all the paraffin wax (71 wt% of binder mixture) was removed in 2 hours under 28 MPa and in 2.5 hours under 25 MPa. We also studied the cosolvent effects on the binder removal rate in the supercritical CO2 debinding. It was found that the addition of non-polar cosolvent (n-hexane) dramatically improves the binder removal rate (more than 2 times) for the paraffin wax-based binder system.
[References]
  1. Angus S, Armstrong A, deReuk KM, "Carbon Dioxide. International Thermodynamic Tables of the Fluid State," Pergamon, Oxford, 1976
  2. Chartier T, Delhomme E, Baumard JF, Marteau P, Subra P, Tufeu R, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(5), 1904, 1999
  3. Chartier T, Ferrato M, Baumard JF, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 78, 1787, 1995
  4. Chartier T, Ferrato M, Baumard JF, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 15, 899, 1995
  5. Crank J, "The Mathematics of Diffusion," 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975
  6. Dobbs JM, Wong JM, Lahiere RJ, Johnston KP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 56, 1987
  7. Foster NR, Singh H, JimmyYun SL, Tomasko DL, Macnaughton SJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 32, 2849, 1993
  8. German RM, Int. J. Powder Metall., 23, 237, 1987
  9. Hens KF, "Process Analysis of Injection Molding with Powder Mixtures," Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York, 1990
  10. McHugh MA, Krukonis VJ, "Supercritical Fluid Extraction, Principles and Practice," 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 15, 1994
  11. Milke EC, Schaeffer L, Souza JP, Adv. Powder Technol., 636, 2001
  12. Muthukumaran P, Gupta RB, Sung HD, Shim JJ, Bae HK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(1), 111, 1999
  13. Nashikawa E, Wakao N, Nakashima N, J. Supercrit. Fluids, 4, 265, 1991
  14. Noh MJ, Kim TG, Hong IK, Yoo KP, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 12(1), 48, 1995
  15. Rei M, Souza JP, Schaeffer L, Adv. Powder Technol., 616, 2001
  16. Shewmon PG, "Diffusion in Solids," McGraw-Hill Book Company, U.S., 1963
  17. Shivashankar TS, German RM, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 82, 1146, 1999
  18. Shimizu T, Mochizuki S, Sano T, Fuchizawa S, P.P. Metall., 43, 1188, 1996
  19. Takishima S, Matsumoto H, Nagasaki H, Masuoka H, Mukai Y, Sakai Y, Kag. Kog. Ronbunshu, 17, 243, 1991
  20. Taylor LT, "Supercritical Fluid Extraction," John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996
  21. Tam KC, Yap SP, Foong ML, Loh NH, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 67, 120, 1997