Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.19, No.6, 921-927, 2002
Partial Oxidation (POX) Reforming of Gasoline for Fuel-Cell Powered Vehicles Applications
As a part of the development of a gasoline processor for integration with a proton-exchanged membrane (PEM) fuel cell, we carried out the POX reforming reaction of iso-octane, toluene and gasoline over a commercial methane reforming catalyst, and investigated the reaction conditions required to prevent the formation of carbon and the effect of fuel constituents and sulfur impurities in gasoline. The H2 and CO compositions increased with increasing reaction temperature, while those of CO2 and CH4 decreased. It is desirable to maintain an O/C molar ratio of more than 0.6 and an H2O/C molar ratio of 1.5 to 2.0 for vehicle applications. It has been found that carbon formation in the POX reforming of iso-octane occurs below 620 ℃, whereas in the case of toluene it occurs below 640 ℃. POX reforming of gasoline constituents led to the conclusion that hydrogen production is directly related to the constituents of fuels and the operating conditions. It was also found that the coke formation on the surface of catalysts is promoted by sulfur impurities in fuels. For the integration of a fuel processor with PEM fuel cell, studies are needed on the development of new high-performance transition metal-based catalysts with sulfur- and coke-resistance and the desulfurization of fuels before applying the POX reformer based on gasoline feed.
[References]
  1. Borroni-Bird AE, "Fuel Issues for Fuel Cell Vehicles," Soc. Automotive Engineers, 952762, 2118, 1995
  2. Borup R, Inbody M, Hong JK, Morton B, Tafoya J, "Fuel and Fuel Impurity Effect and Fuel Processing Catalysts," 2000 Fuel Cell Seminar Abstract, Portland, OR, USA, 288, 2000
  3. Burch R, Crittle DJ, Hayes MJ, Catal. Today, 47(1-4), 229, 1999
  4. Chalk SG, Milliken J, Miller JF, Venkateswaran SR, J. Power Sources, 71(1-2), 26, 1998
  5. Docter A, Lamm A, J. Power Sources, 84(2), 194, 1999
  6. DOE, Cost Analysis of Fuel Cell System for Transportation, Task 1 and 2 Final Report, Arthur D. Little Inc., 2000
  7. DOE, Multi-Fuel Reformers for Fuel Cells Used in Transportation, Multi-Fuel Reformers Phase I, Final Report, DOE/CE/50343-2, Arthur D. Little Inc., 1994
  8. Flynn TJ, Privette RM, Perna MA, Kneidel KE, King DL, Cooper M, "Compact Fuel Processor for Fuel Cell-Powered Vehicles," Soc. Automotive Engineer, 1999-01-0536, 47, 1999
  9. Patt J, Moon DJ, Phillips C, Thompson L, Catal. Lett., 65(4), 193, 2000
  10. Kopasz JP, Applegate D, Ruscic L, Ahmed S, Krumpelt K, "Effect of Gasoline Component on Fuel Processing and Implications for Fuel Cell Fuels," 2000 Fuel Cell Seminar Abstract, Portland, OR, USA, 284, 2000
  11. Moon DJ, Screekumar K, Lee SD, Lee BG, "Development of Gasoline Fuel Processor System for Fuel-Cell Powered Vehicles," Theory and Applications of Chemical Engineering, Proceeding of 2000 KIChE Fall Meeting, 6(2), 2313, 2000
  12. Moon DJ, Sreekumar K, Lee SD, Lee BG, Kim HS, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 215(1-2), 1, 2001
  13. Pro-II reference manual, version 1.0, Section 2.6, Simulation Science Inc., U.S.A., 1994
  14. Querini CA, Fung SC, J. Catal., 161(1), 263, 1996
  15. Raman V, "The hydrogen Fuel Option for Fuel Cell Vehicle Fleets," Soc. Automotive Engineers, 1999-01-0529, 1, 1999
  16. Smith WR, Missen RW, "Chemical Reaction Equilibrium Analysis: Theory and Algorithm," Krieger Publication Company, U.S.A., 1991
  17. Sun YK, Lee WY, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 12(1), 36, 1995