Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.19, No.4, 535-544, 2002
Improved Evolutionary Operation Based on D-optimal Design and Response Surface Method
This paper presents improved evolutionary operation based on D-optimal design and response surface method. D-optimal design and response surface method allow us to overcome the disadvantages of conventional evolutionary operation. Although evolutionary operation has been an effective alternative when fundamental models are hard to build because of the lack of the necessary information, the disadvantages in the number of experiments, experimental design and analysis and detection of the optimal point have prevented EVOP from being frequently applied to real processes. To compare the performance of the proposed method and the conventional EVOP, both of them were applied to a pulp digester process. As a result, the comparable response variable value has been clearly obtained with the proposed method while conducting much fewer numbers of experiments than the conventional evolutionary operation. In addition, the proposed method flexibly handles the constraints in the experimental design and gives more reliable experiment results than the conventional evolutionary operation. By virtue of these benefits, the proposed method can be utilized effectively for a process where prior knowledge for the process is not available.
[References]
  1. Banerjee R, Bhattacharyya BC, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 41, 67, 1993
  2. Box GEP, Appl. Statist., 4, 3, 1957
  3. Box GEP, Draper NR, "Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces," John Wiley & Sons, New York, U.S.A., 1987
  4. Box GEP, Wilson KB, J. Roy. Statist. Soc., B13(1), 38, 1951
  5. Choi SH, Manousiouthakis V, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(2), 227, 2002
  6. Choi YJ, Kwon TI, Yeo YK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(6), 712, 2000
  7. DuMouchel W, Jones B, Technometrics, 36, 37, 1994
  8. Galil Z, Kiefer J, Technometrics, 21, 301, 1980
  9. Geladi P, Kowalski BR, Anal. Chim. Acta, 185, 1, 1986
  10. Hunter WG, Kittrell JR, Technometrics, 8, 389, 1966
  11. Janson JC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(2), 149, 2001
  12. Johnson ME, Nachtsheim CJ, Technometrics, 25, 271, 1983
  13. Kayihan F, "Continuous Digester Benchmark Model v1.0," IETek, Washington, U.S.A., 1997
  14. Lee JH, Lim HC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(1), 118, 1999
  15. Lee SJ, Lee MH, Chang KS, Han C, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 36(3), 415, 1998
  16. Lee SJ, Lee MH, Chang KS, Han C, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 36(3), 422, 1998
  17. Mitchell TJ, Technometrics, 16, 203, 1974
  18. Nelder JA, Mead R, Comput. J., 7, 308, 1965
  19. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W, "Applied Linear Statistical Models," 4th ed., IRWIN, New York, U.S.A., 1996
  20. Park JC, Ha DM, Kim MG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 13(2), 115, 1996
  21. Piepel GF, J. Qual. Technol., 20, 125, 1988
  22. Powell MJD, Comput. J., 7, 155, 1964
  23. Saad EE, Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 15, 17, 1994
  24. Tunga R, Banerjee R, Bhattacharyya BC, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 87, 224, 1999
  25. Yi HS, Han C, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(4), 442, 2001