Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.17, No.6, 619-624, 2000
Sliding Mode Control of a Bioreactor
In this paper, sliding mode control (SMC) of a bioreactor is considered and is compared with PID control. The magnitude of the error in SMC is found to be lower than that in PID control. Moreover, the magnitudes of cells and nutrients were very close to the selected reference values in SMC, whereas they were quite different in PID control. Overall, SMC was more robust against disturbances and had better performance than PID control.
[References]
  1. Agrawal P, Lee C, Lim HC, Ramkrishna D, Chem. Eng. Sci., 37, 453, 1982
  2. Agrawal P, Lim HC, Adv. Biochem. Eng.-Biotechnol., 30, 61, 1984
  3. Valentine CC, Chidambaram M, Chem. Eng. Commun., 162, 63, 1997
  4. Ertugrul M, Sabanovic A, Kaynak O, "Various VSS Techniques on the control of Automated Guided Vehicles and Autonomous Robots," Project Report of CAD/CAM Robotic Department, Tubitak Marmara Research Center, Gebze, Turkey, 1994
  5. Hung JY, Gao W, Hung JC, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 40, 2, 1993
  6. Morari M, Zafiriou E, "Robust Process Control," Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1989
  7. Slotine JJ, Li W, "Applied Nonlinear Control," Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1991
  8. Sung SW, Lee IB, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(1), 45, 1999
  9. Ungar LH, "A Bioreactor Benchmark for Adaptive Network-based Process Control," in W.T. Miller, R.S. Sutton, P.J. Werbas, Neural Networks for Control, MIT Press, 1991
  10. Utkin VI, "Sliding Mode in Control Optimization," Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992
  11. Utkin VI, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC-22, 212, 1977
  12. Wang GB, Peng SS, Huang HP, Chem. Eng. Sci., 52(5), 787, 1997
  13. Yamamoto T, Oki T, Kaneda M, Electrical Eng. Jpn., 118, 3, 1997
  14. Zhao Y, Skogestad S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(3), 697, 1997