Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.17, No.5, 516-523, 2000
The Use of a Partially Simulated Exothermic Reactor to Test Nonlinear Algorithms
Two nonlinear control algorithms for controlling nonlinear systems include the receding horizon method and the nonlinear neural network inverse model methods. These methods have been found to be useful in dealing with difficult-to-control nonlinear systems, especially in simulated systems. However although much simulation work has been performed with these methods, simulation only is inadequate to guarantee that these algorithms could be successfully implemented in real plants. For this reason, a relatively low cost and simple online experimental configuration of a partially simulated continuous reactor has been devised which allows for the realistic testing of a wide range of nonlinear estimation and control techniques i.e. receding horizon control and neural network inverse model control methods. The results show that these methods are viable and attractive nonlinear methods for real-time application in chemical reactor systems.
[References]
  1. Bequette BW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30, 1391, 1991
  2. Biegler L, Rawlings J, "Optimization Approaches to Nonlinear Model Predictive Control," In Chemical Process Control CPCIV Proceedings, 1991
  3. Economou C, Morari M, Palsson BO, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 25, 403, 1986
  4. Hunt KJ, Sbarbaro D, "IEE Control Engineering Series," London, 1992
  5. Hussain MA, Ph.D. Thesis, "Inverse Model Control Strategy using Neural Networks: Analysis, Simulation and Online Implementation," Univ. of London, 1996
  6. Hussain MA, J. Art. Int. Eng., 13, 55, 1999
  7. Kershenbaum L, Kittisupakorn P, "The Use of a Partially Simulated Exothermic (PARSEX) Reactor for Experimental Testing of Control Algorithms," Transaction of Institution of Chemical Engineers, Vol. 72, Part A, January, 1994
  8. Kershenbaum L, Mayne D, Pytak R, Vinter R, "Receeding Horizon Control," Workshop Advances in Model Based Predictive Control, Oxford, U.K., 1993
  9. Kwon W, Pearson A, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 20(5), 833, 1977
  10. Limqueco LC, Kantor JC, Comput. Chem. Eng., 14(5), 427, 1990
  11. Manye D, Michalska H, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 35(7), 814, 1990
  12. Maybeck PS, Reduced order Kalman filter design and performance analysis, in ARGARD, NATO advisory group for aerospace research and development, No. 256, London, 1982
  13. Mayne D, "Optimization in Model Based Control," In 4th IFAC Symposium on Dynamic and Control of Chemical Reactors, Distillation Columns and Batch Processes, DyCord+'95, Denmark, 1995
  14. Nahas EP, Henson MA, Seborg DE, Comput. Chem. Eng., 16(2), 1039, 1992
  15. Pao YH, Phillips SM, Sobajic DJ, Int. J. Control, 56(2), 263, 1992
  16. Psichogios DM, Ungar LH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 30, 2564, 1991