Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.38, No.11, 2195-2207, 2021
Thermo-economic evaluation of R1233zd(E) as an R245fa alternative in organic Rankine cycle for geothermal applications
To quicken the process for high global warming potential (GWP) working fluid replacement for organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems, a thermo-economic evaluation of low GWP fluid R1233zd(E) as an R245fa alternative has been performed in comparison with other natural fluids n-Pentane, Isopentane, and Isobutane for geothermal applications. The heat source water mass flow rate remains constant and 5K pinch point is set for both evaporator side and condenser side. All working fluids have a close net thermal efficiency within 2%. Increasing the heat source from 120 °C to 160 °C gives a more than 20% efficiency rise. The low critical temperature of Isobutane limits its application for 160 °C heat source. R1233zd(E) displays a close mass flow rate (within 2%) from R245fa and others exhibit more than 40% flow rate reduction. The component level performance has also been investigated in this study. All alternatives exhibit a lower evaporator side (evaporator and preheater) heat transfer area than baseline R245fa, and a slightly higher condenser side (condenser and desuperheater) heat transfer area. For turbine performance, R245fa displays the highest volume flow ratio, indicating a significant change of the rotor blade height should be made between the inlet and outlet point for the expansion process. R1233zd(E) displays ~10% increase for turbine size parameter from baseline, n-Pentane shows ~22% rise, Isopentane exhibits ~11% rise, while Isobutane presents 32% decrease, respectively. In general, R1233zd(E) only exhibits ~2.3% higher specific investment cost than R245fa, while n-Pentane and Isopentane exhibit more than 15% cost rise. Thus, from the thermo-economic scale with an extended application range, R1233zd(E) exhibits a better overall performance index when compared with other R245fa alternatives and can be serviced as promising candidate to replace R245fa.
[References]
  1. EU climate action, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/eu_en (2021).
  2. Davis M, Moronkeji A, Ahiduzzaman M, Kumar A, Energy Sustain. Dev., 59, 243, 2020
  3. Muhammad U, Imran M, Lee DH, Park BS, Energy Conv. Manag., 103, 1089, 2015
  4. Li MQ, Wang JF, He WF, Gao L, Wang B, Ma SL, Dai YP, Renew. Energy, 57, 216, 2013
  5. Li G, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 21, 33, 2017
  6. Li G, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 38(7), 1438, 2021
  7. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing regulation (EC) No. 842/2006 (2014).
  8. Liu W, Meinel D, Wieland C, Spliethoff H, Energy, 67, 106, 2014
  9. Moles F, Navarro-Esbri J, Peris B, Mota-Babiloni A, Barragan-Cervera A, Kontomaris KK, Appl. Therm. Eng., 71, 204, 2014
  10. Moloney F, Almatrafi E, Goswami DY, Renew. Energy, 147, 2874, 2020
  11. Chen JY, Huang YS, Niu ZT, Chen Y, Luo XL, Energy Conv. Manag., 157, 382, 2018
  12. Longo GA, Mancin S, Righetti G, Zilio C, Brown JS, Appl. Therm. Eng., 167, 114804, 2020
  13. Giuffrida A, Energy, 161, 1172, 2018
  14. Mahmoudi A, Fazli M, Morad MR, Appl. Therm. Eng., 143, 660, 2018
  15. Datla BV, Brasz JJ, 15th International Compressor Engineering Cornference at Purdue, 14-17 July, 2014 (2014).
  16. Eyerer S, Wieland C, Vandersickel A, Spliethoff H, Energy, 103, 660, 2016
  17. Moles F, Navarro-Esbri J, Peris B, Mota-Babiloni A, Appl. Therm. Eng., 98, 954, 2016
  18. Yang J, Sun Z, Yu B, Chen J, Appl. Therm. Eng., 141, 10, 2018
  19. Yang JY, Ye ZH, Yu BB, Ouyang HS, Chen JP, Energy, 173, 721, 2019
  20. Eyerer S, Dawo F, Kaindl J, Wieland C, Spliethoff HM, Appl. Energy, 240, 946, 2019
  21. Talluri L, Dumont O, Manfrida G, Lemort V, Fiaschi D, Appl. Therm. Eng., 174, 115293, 2020
  22. Talluri L, Dumont O, Manfrida G, Lemort V, Fiaschi D, Energy, 211, 118570, 2020
  23. Lemmon E, Huber M, Mclinden M, The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2021).
  24. Cengel YA, Heat and mass transfer (Second ed.), McGraw-Hill (2002).
  25. Kern DQ, Process heat transfer, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New York (1950).
  26. Green D, Perry R, Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York (2007).
  27. McAdams WH, Heat transmission, McGraw-Hill, New York (1958).
  28. Tinker T, Proceedings of the general discussion on heat transfer, Institution Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London (1951).
  29. Hewitt GF, Hemisphere handbook of heat exchanger design, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York (1990).
  30. Boyko LD, Kruzhilin GN, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 10, 361, 1967
  31. Macchi E, Design criteria for turbines operating with fluids having a low speed of sound in closed cycle gas turbines. Lecture series 100 on closed cycle gas turbines (1977).
  32. Dixon SL, Fluid mechanics and thermodynamics of turbomachinery, 4th Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann (1998).
  33. Japikse D, Baines NC, Introduction to turbomachinery, 1st Ed. Concepts ETI, Inc. and Oxford University Press (1997).
  34. Turton R, Bailie RC, Whiting WB, Shaeiwitz JA, Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes, Pearson Education (2008).
  35. Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, http://www.chemengonline.com/pci-home, Chemecal Engineering (2020).