Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.38, No.8, 1642-1647, 2021
Degradation of organic micropollutant by vacuum ultraviolet process: a kinetics study
Vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) process has been regarded as a novel advanced oxidation process for its unique way of generating HOㆍ via direct photolysis of water. This study investigates the kinetics of the VUV process for degradation of a typical pesticide, glyphosate (GLY), by using a photoreactor equipped with a precision sampler. The precision sampler enables us to take samples at distances ranging from 0.1 to 1.5 cm to the irradiation source so that GLY degradation by VUV in different parts of the reaction volume can be evaluated. The results of experiments on H2O2 production from VUV photolysis of water confirmed that there existed an extremely uneven distribution of VUV flux and HOㆍ generated in the VUV process. Enhancing mass transfer by agitation could significantly increase GLY degradation efficiency by improving the distribution of HOㆍ. The initial concentrations of water and GLY governed the reaction kinetics of GLY degradation in the VUV process. As the solution pH increased from 5.0 to 9.0, the overall degradation efficiency of GLY decreased from 97.6% to 77.8%. Depending on their molar absorption coefficients, inorganic anions affected adversely on the degradation of GLY by VUV in the order of NO3 ->HCO3 -(alkalinity)>Cl->SO4 2-. As a strong HOㆍ scavenger, natural organic matter shows a much more adverse impact on GLY degradation than that of inorganic anions. Based on the experimental results, this study has provided insights into the kinetics of VUV process for pollutant degradation.
[References]
  1. Feizi R, Ahmadi M, Jorfi S, Ghanbari F, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 36(6), 886, 2019
  2. Sharma K, Talwar S, Verma AK, Choudhury D, Mansouri B, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 37(2), 350, 2020
  3. Koppenol WH, Liebman JF, J. Phys. Chem., 88, 99, 1984
  4. Zoschke K, Bornick H, Worch E, Water Res., 52, 131, 2014
  5. Li MK, Wang C, Yau ML, Bolton JR, Qiang ZM, Water Res., 108, 348, 2017
  6. Imoberdorf G, Mohseni M, J. Hazard. Mater., 186(1), 240, 2011
  7. Bagheri M, Mohseni M, Chem. Eng. J., 256, 51, 2014
  8. Yao H, Pei J, Wang H, Fu J, Chem. Eng. J., 308, 193, 2017
  9. Dobrovic S, Juretic H, Ruzinski N, Sep. Sci. Technol., 42(7), 1421, 2007
  10. Li MK, Qiang ZM, Hou P, Bolton JR, Qu JH, Li IP, Wang C, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 5849, 2016
  11. Yang LX, Zhang ZH, Water Res., 161, 439, 2019
  12. Yang L, Yao G, Huang S, Chem. Eng. J., 388, 124302, 2020
  13. Legrini O, Oliveros E, Braun AM, Chem. Rev., 93, 671, 1993
  14. Heit G, Neuner A, Saugy PY, Braun AM, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102(28), 5551, 1998
  15. Gonzalez MG, Oliveros E, Worner M, Braun AM, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C, 5, 225, 2004
  16. Weeks JL, Meaburn GMAC, Gordon S, Radiat. Res., 19, 559, 1963
  17. Imoberdorf G, Mohseni M, Chem. Eng. J., 187, 114, 2012
  18. Wu Z, Yang L, Tang Y, Qiang Z, Li M, Chemosphere, 273, 129724, 2021
  19. Bader H, Sturzenegger V, Hoigne J, Water Res., 22, 1109, 1988
  20. Crapulli F, Santoro D, Sasges MR, Ray AK, Water Res., 64, 209, 2014
  21. Li MK, Qiang ZM, Pulgarin C, Kiwi J, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 187, 83, 2016
  22. Yang LX, Li MK, Li WT, Bolton JR, Qiang ZM, Photochem. Photobiol., 94, 821, 2018
  23. Huang L, Jing HY, Cheng ZH, Dong WB, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem., 251, 69, 2013
  24. Mora AS, Mohseni M, Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol., 4, 1303, 2018
  25. Buchanan W, Roddick F, Porter N, Water Res., 42, 3335, 2008
  26. Buchanan W, Roddick F, Porter N, Chemosphere, 63, 1130, 2006