Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.38, No.7, 1370-1380, 2021
Correlative HHV prediction from proximate and ultimate analysis of char obtained from co-cracking of residual fuel oil with plastics
It is imperative to know the energy content of the char to ascertain its application, which is environmentally friendly and efficient. In this context, the higher heating values (HHV) of the char resulting from the co-cracking of residual fuel oil (RFO) with various other waste plastics have been determined experimentally. Experimental results of the proximate and ultimate analysis of the char obtained from the co-cracking process were used to estimate the higher heating values (HHV) using eight different correlation models. The char obtained from the co-cracking of RFO and polypropylene (PPI) was found to have higher heating values (HHV) of 31.02 MJ/kg, while the HHV of Bakelite (BL) showed 23.56MJ/kg. The best among the proximate correlations considered in this study resulted in the coefficient (R2) of 0.971, the average bias of ?0.68%, and absolute error of 1.70%. The most relevant among the ultimate correlation models resulted in the coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.980, whereas the average and absolute bias errors were found to be -1.29% and 0.25%, respectively. The proximate and ultimate analysis of the chars reveals a direct interaction between the reactive species during the co-cracking of RFO with various types of plastic waste used in the study.
[References]
  1. Ahmaruzzaman M, Bioresour. Technol., 99(11), 5043, 2008
  2. Biswas S, Sharma DK, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 101, 17, 2013
  3. Phetyim N, Pivsa-Art S, Energies, 11(11), 1, 2018
  4. Faillace JG, de Melo CF, de Souza SPL, da Costa Marques MR, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 126, 70, 2017
  5. Kasar P, Sharma DK, Ahmaruzzaman M, J. Clean Prod., 265, 121639, 2020
  6. Kasar P, Ahmaruzzaman M, JSIR, 78, 426, 2019
  7. Kasar P, Ahmaruzzaman M, Pet. Sci. Technol., 36, 18, 2018
  8. Gupta VK, Sharma S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(25), 6619, 2003
  9. Jain AK, Gupta VK, Bhatnagar A, Suhas, J. Hazard. Mater., 101(1), 31, 2003
  10. Gupta VK, Ali I, Colloid Polym. Sci., 271, 321, 2004
  11. Channiwala SA, Parikh PP, Fuel, 81(8), 1051, 2002
  12. Nhuchhen DR, Afzal MT, Bioengineering, 4(1), 2017
  13. Qian C, Li Q, Zhang Z, Wang X, Hu J, Cao W, Fuel, 265, 116925, 2020
  14. Cordero T, Marquez F, Rodriguez-Mirasol J, Rodriguez JJ, Fuel, 80, 1567, 2001
  15. Kucukbayrak S, Durus B, Mericboyu AE, Kadioglu E, Fuel, 70, 979, 1991
  16. Fernandez P, Diaz RM, Xiberta J, Fuel, 76(10), 951, 1997
  17. Demirbas A, Fuel, 76(5), 431, 1997
  18. Jimenez L, Gonzalez F, Fuel, 70, 947, 1991
  19. Raveendran K, Ganesh A, Fuel, 75, 1715, 1996
  20. van Krevelen DW, Schuyer J, Coal science- aspect of coal constitution, Amsterdam: Elsevier Pub. Co (1957).
  21. ASTM D 3172-73(84), Standards method of proximate analysis of coal and coke in gaseous fuels; coal and coke, p.299, 1989.
  22. ASTM D 3175-89, coal and coke, p.305, 1989.
  23. ASTM D 3173-87, coal and coke, p.300, 1989.
  24. ASTM D 3174-89, coal and coke, p.302, 1989.
  25. Nhuchhen DR, Salam PA, Fuel, 99, 55, 2012
  26. Nhuchhen DR, Fuel, 180, 348, 2016
  27. Parikh J, Channiwala SA, Ghosal GK, Fuel, 84(5), 487, 2005
  28. Selvig WA, Gibson FH, Calorific value of coal, 1st Ed. New York, Wiley (1945).
  29. Boie W, Energietechnik, 3, 309, 1953
  30. Miura K, Makino M, Silveston P, Fuel, 69, 580, 1990
  31. Darmstadt H, Roy C, Kaliaguine S, Corner H, Rubber Chem. Technol., 70, 759, 1997
  32. Boumanchar I, Chhiti Y, M'hamdi Alaoui FE, Sahibed-Dine A, Bentiss F, Jama C, Bensitel M, Waste Manag. Res., 37(6), 578, 2019
  33. Ballice L, Fuel, 81(9), 1233, 2002