Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.38, No.2, 337-341, 2021
Effects of inert gas addition, oxygen concentration, and pressure on explosion characteristics of propylene
Propylene is used for manufacturing commonly used raw materials and synthetic materials for petrochemical processes. However, it is a volatile and flammable material that poses fire and explosion risks. Nitrogen is inexpensive and can lower the propylene explosion limit because of the dilution effect when used as an inert gas. This study measures the explosion limit, minimum oxygen concentration (MOC), explosion pressure, explosion pressure rise rate, and deflagration index (Kg) values for propylene and nitrogen at 25 °C. Results showed that the lower explosion limit of the explosion range did not significantly change with an increase in pressure from 0.10MPa to 0.25MPa; however, the upper explosion limit increased significantly. Furthermore, the MOC decreased as pressure increased at 25 °C, while both the maximum explosion pressure and maximum explosion pressure rise rate increased, thereby increasing the explosion risk. The risk of propylene was predicted by the Kg values determined using the maximum explosion pressure rise rate and volume based on the experimental data. Therefore, through this study, we provide basic data on safety references for preventing fire and explosion accidents.
[References]
  1. Corma A, Melo FV, Sauvanaud L, Ortega F, Catal. Today, 107-108, 699, 2005
  2. Sleenko MG, Boojdan JM, Beskov VS, Yemelyanov ID, J. Catal., 1(2), 197, 1962
  3. Lee TS, Sung JY, Park DJ, Fire Saf. J., 49, 62, 2012
  4. Bazalan BB, Effect of pressure on the flammability limits of acetylene, Bachelor’s thesis report, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 11 (2012).
  5. Van den Schoor F, Influence of pressure and temperature on flammability limits of combustible gases in air, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 64-72 (2007).
  6. Cui G, Wang S, Bi ZX, Li ZL, Fuel, 233, 159, 2018
  7. Mitu M, Prodan M, Giurcan V, Razus D, Oancea D, Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 102, 513, 2016
  8. Casillas J, Cordon O, Triguero FH, Magdalena L, Interpretability issues in fuzzy modeling, Springer, New York (2013).
  9. Kundu S, Zanganeh J, Moghtaderi B, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 40, 507, 2016
  10. Shen XB, Zhang B, Zhang XL, Xiu GL, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 45, 102, 2017
  11. Li YC, Bi MS, Li B, Zhou YH, Gao W, Fuel, 233, 269, 2018
  12. Giurcan V, Mitu M, Movileanu C, Razus D, Oancea D, Fire Saf. J., 111, 102939, 2020
  13. Zabetakis MG, Flammability characteristics of combustible gases and vapors, Bureau of Mines, Washington DC (1965).
  14. Mitu M, Brandes E, Fuel, 203, 460, 2017
  15. Koshiba Y, Takigawa T, Matsuoka Y, Ohtani H, J. Hazard. Mater., 183(1-3), 746, 2010
  16. Luo ZM, Liu LT, Cheng FM, Wang T, Su B, Zhang J, Gao SS, Wang C, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 58, 8, 2019
  17. Lee TS, Sung JY, Park DJ, Fire Saf. J., 49, 62, 2012
  18. Li X, Yu Q, Zhou N, Liu X, Huang W, Zhao H, Adv. Mech. Eng., 11(5), 1, 2019
  19. Yu XZ, Yan XQ, Ji WT, Luo C, Yao FT, Yu JL, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 59, 100, 2019
  20. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA (2011).
  21. Cengel YA, Cimbala JM, Fluid mechanics: fundamentals and applications 4th Ed. in SI units, McGraw-Hill, New York (2019).
  22. Cengel YA, Boles MA, Thermodynamics an engineering approach 8th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (2014).