Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.37, No.12, 2202-2208, 2020
High capacity ethidium bromide removal by montmorillonites
Ethidium bromide (EtBr) is commonly used as a reagent to investigate DNA and RNA bonding in biochemistry. However, it is mutagenic and toxic; thus, its removal from the waste solution is of the top priority in lab safety practice. Although many products with high EtBr removal capacities are available on the market, developing new products with low material costs and high removal capacities is still an urgent priority. As the EtBr is in a cationic form Et+ balanced by counterion Br- in aqueous solution, materials with high cation exchange capacity and large specific surface area may have great potential for efficient EtBr removal, Thus, several montmorillonites (MMTs) were evaluated for their EtBr removal capacity and methods of regeneration in this study. Results showed that both external and internal surfaces of MMTs were effective sorption sites for EtBr with a capacity up to 600mg/g. And the waste-laden materials could be regenerated or safely disposed after incineration at 500 °C for 2 h. As such, further tests on optimization and manufacturing kits or devices for practical EtBr removal in routine lab practice is of engineering priority, should MMTs be further explored as an effective material for EtBr removal.
[References]
  1. Lunn G, Sansone EB, Anal. Biochem., 162, 453, 1987
  2. Menozzi FD, Michel A, Pora H, Miller AOA, Chromatographia, 29, 167, 1990
  3. Moradi O, Norouzi M, Fakhri A, Naddafi K, J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 12, 17, 2014
  4. Rajabi M, Moradi O, Zare K, Int. Nano Lett., 7, 35, 2017
  5. https://www.thomassci.com/Equipment/Electrophoresis-Systems/_/EtBr-Green-Bag-Disposal-Kit.
  6. https://www.mpbio.com/etbr-greenbag-disposal-kit-50-bag.
  7. Celis R, Hermosin MC, Cornejo J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 4593, 2000
  8. Li LY, Environ. Technol., 27, 811, 2006
  9. Adeyemo AA, Adeoye IO, Bello OS, Appl. Water Sci., 7, 543, 2017
  10. Harris RG, Wells JD, Johnson BB, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 180, 131, 2001
  11. Yu HW, Fugetsu B, J. Hazard. Mater., 177(1-3), 138, 2010
  12. Cheng C, Ma L, Ren J, Li LL, Zhang GF, Yang QG, Zhao CS, Chem. Eng. J., 171(3), 1132, 2011
  13. Heibati B, Yetilmezsoy K, Zazouli MA, Rodriguez-Couto S, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK, J. Mol. Liq., 213, 41, 2016
  14. Li Z, Chang PH, Jiang WT, Liu Y, J. Hazard. Mater., 384, 121254, 2020
  15. Zimmermann Z, Zimmermann HW, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung C, 31656 (1976).
  16. Thomas G, Roques B, Febs Lett., 26, 169, 1972
  17. Carbajo J, Adan C, Rey A, Martinez-Arias A, Bahamonde A, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 102(1-2), 85, 2011
  18. Bowman RB, et al., Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York (2001).
  19. Khan A, Szulejko JE, Kim KH, Sammadar P, Lee SS, Yang X, Ok YS, Environ. Res., 168, 96, 2019
  20. Guggenheim S, Groos FK, Clay Clay Min., 49, 433, 2001
  21. Chang PH, Li Z, Jiang WT, Jean JS, Appl. Clay Sci., 46, 27, 2009
  22. Chang PH, Jean JS, Jiang WT, Li Z, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 339, 94, 2009
  23. CMS, http://www.clays.org/sourceclays_data.html.
  24. U.S. Geological Survey, Mineral commodity summaries 2019: U.S. Geological Survey, 200 p. (2019), https://doi.org/10.3133/70202434.
  25. Eldaroti HH, Gadir SA, Refat MS, Adam AMA, Spectroc. Acta Pt. A-Molec. Biomolec. Spectr., 109, 259, 2013