Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.35, No.10, 2010-2014, 2018
Performance of molten carbonate fuel cell with Li-Na and Li-K carbonate electrolyte at extremely high-temperature condition
The cell performance of Li-K and Li-Na carbonate electrolytes was compared using a coin type molten carbonate fuel cell operated at the extremely high temperature of 800 oC. It was an acceleration test to compare the performance in a short period. Electrochemical techniques such as steady state polarization (SSP) and impedance from the Nyquist plot were used in the cell performance analysis. The initial performance of both electrolytes was similar, but the performance of the Li-K electrolyte decreased drastically after 180 h. The results from SSP showed that the total overpotential of the Li-K electrolyte increased sharply, whereas that of Li-Na electrolyte had a continuous performance up to 340 h. The impedance analysis showed that the internal resistance of the Li-K electrolyte increased with time, but that of Li-Na electrolyte remained unchanged. The remaining amount of each electrolyte was determined, and it was observed that the electrolyte loss rate of the Li-K electrolyte was 0.0072 g/hr, and that of Li-Na electrolyte was 0.0028 g/ hr. This implies that the electrolyte depletion rate of the Li-K electrolyte is about 1.5 times faster than that of the Li-Na electrolyte at the high-temperature condition. Thus, the cell of a Li-Na electrolyte containing MCFC according to the consumption of electrolyte is expected to be longer than one that uses Li-K electrolyte.
[References]
  1. Lee CG, J. Electroanal. Chem., 701, 36, 2013
  2. Tokio O, Energy carriers and conversion systems, UNESCO-EOLSS, France, Vol. 2 (2009).
  3. Rexed I, Application for Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (2014).
  4. Rashidi R, Berg P, Dincer I, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 34(10), 4395, 2009
  5. McPhail S, Leto L, Pietra MD, Cigolotti V, Moreno A, International status of molten carbonate fuel cells technology - 2015, ENEA Publications, Italy (2015).
  6. Choi HJ, Lee JJ, Hyun SH, Lim HC, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 36(17), 11048, 2011
  7. Lee CG, Lee SY, Ryu BH, Kim DH, Lim HC, J. Korean Electrochem. Soc., 13, 34, 2010
  8. Lee CG, Lim HC, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152(1), A219, 2005
  9. Antolini E, Appl. Energy, 88(12), 4274, 2011
  10. Morita Y, Komoda M, Mugikura Y, Izaki Y, Watanabe T, Masuda Y, Matsuyama T, J. Power Sources, 122, 509, 2002
  11. Mamantov G, Braunstein J, Advances in Molten Salt Chemistry, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 4 (1981).
  12. Frangini S, J. Power Sources, 182(2), 462, 2008
  13. Lee CG, Hur H, Song MB, J. Electrochem. Soc., 158(4), B410, 2011
  14. Kim YJ, Kim TK, Lee KJ, Lee CG, J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol., 7(3), 234, 2016
  15. Lee CG, J. Electroanal. Chem., 776, 162, 2016