Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.35, No.2, 355-363, 2018
Maximum production of methanol in a pilot-scale process
Mathematical models for both bench- and pilot-scale methanol synthesis reactors were developed by estimating the overall heat transfer coefficients due to different heat transfer characteristics, while the effectiveness factor was fixed because the same catalysts were used in both reactors. The overall heat transfer coefficient of a pilot-scale reactor was approximately twice that of a bench-scale reactor, while the estimate from the correlation reported for the heat transfer coefficient was 1.8-times higher, indicating that the values determined in the present study are effective. The model showed that the maximum methanol production rate of approximately 16 tons per day was achievable with peak temperature maintained below 250 °C in the open-loop case. Meanwhile, when the recycle was used to prevent the loss of unreacted gas, peak temperature and production rate decreased due to low CO and CO2 fraction in the recycled stream at the same space velocity as the open-loop operation. Further analysis showed that, since the reaction was in the kinetic regime, the production rate could be maximized up to 18.7 tons per day by increasing the feed flowrate and inlet temperature despite thermodynamically exothermic reaction.
[References]
  1. Olah GA, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit., 44, 2636, 2005
  2. Olah GA, Prakash GKS, US Patent (US7608743 B2) (2009).
  3. Denise B, Sneeden RPA, Hamon C, J. Mol. Catal., 17, 359, 1982
  4. Mizsey P, Newson E, Truong TB, Hottinger P, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 213(2), 233, 2001
  5. Sedighi M, Ghasemi M, Jahangiri A, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(4), 997, 2017
  6. Lim HW, Park MJ, Kang SH, Chae HJ, Bae JW, Jun KW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(23), 10448, 2009
  7. Toyir J, de la Piscina PR, Fierro JLG, Homs N, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 29(3), 207, 2001
  8. Wu JG, Luo SC, Toyir J, Saito M, Takeuchi M, Watanabe T, Catal. Today, 45(1-4), 215, 1998
  9. Klier K, Adv. Catal., 31, 243, 1982
  10. Natta G, in Catalysis, P. H. Emmett Eds., Reinhold, New York (1955).
  11. Takagawa M, Ohsugi M, J. Catal., 107, 161, 1987
  12. Peter M, Fichtl MB, Ruland H, Kaluza S, Muhler M, Hinrichsen O, Chem. Eng. J., 203, 480, 2012
  13. Park N, Park MJ, Lee YJ, Ha KS, Jun KW, Fuel Process. Technol., 125, 139, 2014
  14. Kopac D Hus M, Ogrizek M, Likozar B, J. Phys. Chem., 121, 17941, 2017
  15. Løvik I, Hillestad M, Hertzberg T, Comput. Chem. Eng., 22, S707, 1998
  16. Kordabadi H, Jahanmiri A, Chem. Eng. J., 108(3), 249, 2005
  17. Kordabadi H, Jahanmiri A, Chem. Eng. Process., 46(12), 1299, 2007
  18. Lim HW, Jun HJ, Park MJ, Kim HS, Bae JW, Ha KS, Chae HJ, Jun KW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(6), 1760, 2010
  19. Zhang C, Jun KW, Gao R, Kwak G, Park HG, Fuel, 190, 303, 2017
  20. Smith JM, Van Ness HC, Abbott MM, 7th Ed. McGraw-Hill, New York (2005).
  21. Fogler HS, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1999).
  22. Sieder EN, Tate GE, Ind. Eng. Chem., 28, 1429, 1936
  23. Graaf GH, Sijtsema PJJM, Stamhuis EJ, Joosten GEH, Chem. Eng. Sci., 41, 2883, 1986
  24. Ng KL, Chadwick D, Toseland BA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(15-16), 3587, 1999