Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.12, 3125-3131, 2017
A comparison of fluidized bed pyrolysis of oil sand from Utah, USA, and Alberta, Canada
Characterization and thermal pyrolysis of oil sand was conducted. The experiment was performed on Circle Cliffs, Utah, U.S.A. and the results were compared with the data from Alberta, Canada. The reaction character identified by TGA was dual mode of vaporization of light hydrocarbon and thermal cracking of high molecular hydrocarbon. The pyrolysis experiment was performed in a 2 kg/h capacity fluidized bed externally heated by electricity. The process variables investigated were a temperature range of 723-923 K, fluidization gas velocity of 1.5-2 times of the minimum fluidization velocity, solid retention time of 15-30 minutes, and average particle size of 435 microns. The results of TGA and elemental analysis of bitumen provided necessary information regarding maximum liquid yield from the pyrolysis prior to pyrolysis experiment. The oil yield was maximum at 823 K. The yield of liquid was not exceeding the weight percent of maltenes in original bitumen. The optimum reaction condition should be fast vaporization of light hydrocarbon and minimizing thermal cracking of high molecular hydrocarbon. To maximize the liquid yield, fast heating and vaporization of oil sand bitumen and then the rapid removal of the vaporized product from the heating zone is recommended, i.e., operation in a fluidized bed reactor.
[References]
  1. Oil Shale & Tar Sands Programmatic EIS, http://ostseis.anl.gov/ guide/tarsands/index.htm (2017).
  2. Engelhardt R, Todirscu M, An Introduction to Development in Alberta’s Oil Sand, University of Alberta School of Business (2005).
  3. Masliyah J, Zhou ZJ, Xu ZH, Czarnecki J, Hamza H, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 82(4), 628, 2004
  4. Dai Q, Chung KH, Fuel, 75(2), 220, 1996
  5. Coronella CJ, Seader JD, Fuel, 71, 143, 1992
  6. Shin JS, Sun YK, Park YC, Bae DH, Jo SH, Shun D, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 48(1), 68, 2010
  7. Fletcher JV, Deo MD, Hanson FV, Power Technol., 76, 141, 1993
  8. Alboudwarej H, Beck J, Svrcek WY, Yarranton HW, Akbarzadeh K, Energy Fuels, 16(2), 462, 2002
  9. Ng SH, Humphries A, Fairbridge C, Zhu YX, Khulbe C, Tsai TYR, Ding FC, Charland JP, Yui S, Fuel Process. Technol., 86(12-13), 1335, 2005
  10. Czarnecka E, Gillott JE, Clay Clay Min., 28(3), 197, 1980
  11. Park YC, Paek JY, Bae DH, Shun D, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(6), 1608, 2009
  12. Fletcher JV, Deo MD, Hanson FV, Fuel, 74(3), 311, 1995
  13. Liu Q, Cui Z, Etsell TH, Fuel, 85, 807, 2007
  14. Mullins OC, Sheu EY, Hammami A, Marshall AG (eds.) Asphaltenes, Heavy Oils and Petroleomics, Springer, New York (2007).
  15. Hanson FV, Cha SM, Deo MD, Oblad AG, Fuel, 71(12), 1455, 1992
  16. Gary JH, Handwerk GE, Petroleum refining, Marcel Dekker, New York (1994).
  17. Phillips C, Luymes R, Hlahei TM, Fuel, 61, 639, 1982
  18. Deo DD, Fletcher JV, Shun D, Hanson FV, Oblad AG, Fuel, 70, 1271, 1991
  19. Longstaff DC, Deo MD, Hanson FV, Fuel, 73(9), 1523, 1994