Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.11, 2978-2983, 2017
Nitrogen doped graphene/cobalt-based catalyst layers of a PEM fuel cell: Performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization
The proton exchange membrane fuel cell could be made more commercially viable by substituting the expensive platinic catalyst without loss of performance. This should be done simultaneously through optimization and use of a non-precious metal catalyst. In this study, multi-objective optimization of the catalyst layer was done on nonprecious metal catalysts. Nitrogen-doped graphene (NG)-based cobalt was synthesized as a non-precious metal catalyst. Differential equations were solved at the modeling stage by the shooting method, and objective functions were solved at the optimization stage using sequential quadratic programming. NG-based cobalt was evaluated in a cell and then compared with the platinum catalyst. Results present the synthesized non-precious catalyst as an appropriate replacement for existing precious metal catalyst. Also, the polarization curve demonstrates that the current modeling is in good agreement with NG-based cobalt catalyst. Finally, the Pareto curve at the voltage of 0.6 V (and 300 A/m2 current density in the base case) indicated that the best tradeoff between cost and performance of the catalyst layer was achieved when the current density was increased in the range of 5% to 15%.
[References]
  1. Spiegel C, PEM fuel cell modeling and simulation using Matlab, Elsevier Inc. (2008).
  2. Wilkinson DP, Zhang J, Hui R, Fergus J, Li X, Taylor and Francis Group LLC (2010).
  3. Othman R, Dicks AL, Zhu ZH, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 37(1), 357, 2012
  4. Ghanbarlou H, Rowshanzamir S, Kazeminasab B, Parnian MJ, J. Power Sources, 273, 981, 2015
  5. Broka K, Ekdunge P, J. Appl. Electrochem., 27(3), 281, 1997
  6. Sui PC, Chen LD, Seaba JP, Wariishi Y, SAE Congress, 01, 61, 1999
  7. Wang QP, Song DT, Navessin T, Holdcroft S, Liu ZS, Electrochim. Acta, 50(2-3), 725, 2004
  8. Sun W, Peppley BA, Karan K, Electrochim. Acta, 50(16-17), 3359, 2005
  9. Srinivasarao M, Bhattacharyya D, Rengaswamy R, Narasimhan S, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89(1A), 10, 2011
  10. Kulikovsky AA, Electrochim. Acta, 79, 31, 2012
  11. Mert SO, Ozcelik Z, Int. J. Energy Res., 37(10), 1256, 2013
  12. Feali MS, Fathipour M, Russian J. Electrochem., 50, 561, 2014
  13. Ang SMC, Brett DJL, Fraga ES, J. Power Sources, 195(9), 2754, 2010
  14. Park JC, Park SH, Chung MW, Choi CH, Kho BK, Woo SI, J. Power Sources, 286, 166, 2015
  15. Malko D, Lopes T, Ticianelli EA, Kucernak A, J. Power Sources, 323, 189, 2016
  16. Kazeminasab B, Rowshanzamir S, Ghadamian H, Bulgarian Chem. Commun., 47, 38, 2015
  17. Moein-Jahromi M, Kermani MJ, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 37(23), 17954, 2012
  18. Inamuddin, Cheema TA, Zaidi SMJ, Rahman SU, Renew. Energy, 36(2), 529, 2011
  19. Obut S, Alper E, J. Power Sources, 196(4), 1920, 2011
  20. Khajeh-Hosseini-Dalasm N, Fesanghary M, Fushinobu K, Okazaki K, Electrochim. Acta, 60, 55, 2012
  21. O’Hayre R, Cha SW, Colella W, Prinz FB, Fuel Cell Fundamentals, New York, Wiley (2006).
  22. Zhang J, PEM fuel cell electrocatalysts and catalyst layers, Springer (2008).
  23. Alaswad A, Olabi AG, Palumbo A, Dassisti M, PEM Fuel Cell Cost Analysis during the Period (1998-2014), Elsevier (2016).