Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.4, 1266-1272, 2017
Phase diagram of CaSO4 reductive decomposition by H2 and CO
The CaSO4 reductive decomposition is an interesting issue in both the reduction zone of fluidized bed combustors (FBCs) for coal combustion and the fuel reactor of chemical-looping combustion (CLC) system. Under CO or H2 atmosphere, CaSO4 is reduced to CaS and CaO, together with the releases of gas sulfides, which causes environmental pollutions. To lessen sulfur release, it is important to figure out the chemical stability of CaSO4 reductive decomposition. Thus, the chemical stability of CaSO4/CaS/CaO under CO or H2 atmosphere was studied in consideration of SO2, COS and H2S emissions. The results show that regions I (VI), II (V), and III (IV) are the stability fields of CaSO4, CaS and CaO, respectively. The range for CaO stability is increasing with reaction temperature and partial pressures of CO2 and H2O. Within the reaction temperature range of 800 and 1,000 °C, when the CaSO4-CO-H2 reaction system reaches the triple equilibrium point, the main gas sulfur released is SO2, followed by H2S, while COS generation is much smaller. In a real reaction system, when the values of real PH2/PH2O (PCO/PCO2), PSO2, PH2S (PCOS), PH2O (PCO2) and T fall into Region I (IV), or II (V), the final product should be CaSO4 or CaS, and the sulfur release from CaSO4 reduction can be controlled.
[References]
  1. Anthony EJ, Granatstein DL, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 27(2), 215, 2001
  2. Cheng J, Zhou J, Liu J, Zhou Z, Huang Z, Cao X, Zhao X, Cen K, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 29, 381, 2003
  3. Alshawabkeh A, Matsuda H, Hasatani M, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 28(1), 53, 1995
  4. Adanez J, Abad A, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P, de Diego LF, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 38(2), 215, 2012
  5. Linderholm C, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Fuel, 88(11), 2083, 2009
  6. Ryu HJ, Bae DH, Jin GT, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 960, 2003
  7. Ryu HJ, Lim NY, Bae DH, Jin GT, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(1), 157, 2003
  8. Ryu HJ, Jin GT, Bae DH, Yi CK, Proc 5th China-Korea Joint Workshop on Clean Energy Technology, Qingdao, China (2004).
  9. Ryu HJ, Seo Y, Jin GT, Proc. of the Regional Symp on Chem Eng, Hanoi, Vietnam (2005).
  10. Ryu HJ, Jo SH, Park Y, Bae DH, Kim S, Proc. 1st Int Conf on Chemical Looping, Lyon, France (2010).
  11. Lyngfelt A, Mattisson T, Linderholm C, Ryden M, Proc. 4th International Conference on Chemical Looping. Nanjing, China (2016).
  12. Shen LH, Zheng M, Xiao J, Xiao R, Combust. Flame, 154(3), 489, 2008
  13. Song Q, Xiao R, Deng Z, Shen L, Zhang M, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23, 592, 2009
  14. Song QL, Xiao R, Deng ZY, Zheng WG, Shen LH, Xiao J, Energy Fuels, 22(6), 3661, 2008
  15. Tian HJ, Guo QJ, Chang J, Energy Fuels, 22(6), 3915, 2008
  16. Zheng M, Shen L, Xiao J, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 4, 716, 2010
  17. Hansen PFB, Dam-Johansen K, Ostergaard K, Chem. Eng. Sci., 48, 1325, 1993