Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.4, 1250-1259, 2017
Mechanism underlying the effect of conventional drying on the grinding characteristics of Ximeng lignite
Same amounts of moisture were removed from Ximeng lignite (XL) with different particle size ranges pretreated at different drying temperatures. The effect of conventional drying on the grindability of the XLs was investigated. Increasing the drying temperature improved the grindability of all the samples. The results of scanning electron microscopy and mercury intrusion porosimetry revealed that the dominant mechanism enhancing the grindability of XL with high moisture was the pore structure destruction induced by the steam jet flow generated with the removal of moisture. Especially, the development of large fractures had a strong connection with the change in the grindability. According to the pore size distribution, the internal structure of the 2.5-4.0mm coal samples did not develop well under high drying temperature because of the exceedingly short heating time. Therefore, coal particle size, drying temperature, and heating time must be coordinated well to achieve the enhanced drying effect. The grindability of XL had a negative linear correlation with the pore volume fractal dimension, revealing the possibility of fractal dimension for the analysis of lignite grindability.
[References]
  1. Yi M, Lee JW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33(12), 3401, 2016
  2. Choi H, Jo W, Kim S, Yoo J, Chun D, Rhim Y, Lim J, Lee S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(12), 2151, 2014
  3. Kingman SW, Rowson NA, Miner. Eng., 11(11), 1081, 1998
  4. Csoke B, Bokanyi L, Bohm J, Petho S, Appl. Energy, 74(3-4), 359, 2003
  5. Zivotic D, Bechtel A, Sachsenhofer R, Gratzer R, Radic D, Obradovic M, Stojanovic K, Int. J. Coal Geol., 131, 344, 2014
  6. Vuthaluru HB, Brooke RJ, Zhang DK, Yan HM, Fuel Process. Technol., 81(1), 67, 2003
  7. Chelgani SC, Hower JC, Jorjani E, Mesroghli S, Bagherieh AH, Fuel Process. Technol., 89(1), 13, 2008
  8. Lester E, Kingman S, Dodds C, Fuel, 84(4), 423, 2005
  9. Harrison PC, Rowson NA, I Chem. E Res. Event, 38, 292, 1997
  10. Marland S, Han B, Merchant A, Rowson N, Fuel, 80, 1839, 2001
  11. Lytle J, Choi N, Prisbrey K, Int. J. Miner. Process., 36, 107, 1992
  12. Marland S, Han B, Merchant A, Ravson N, Fuel, 79, 1283, 2000
  13. Zhu JF, Liu JZ, Wu JH, Cheng J, Wang ZH, Zhou JH, Cen KF, Fuel, 162, 305, 2015
  14. Lester E, Kingman S, Dodds C, Fuel, 84(4), 423, 2005
  15. Zhu JF, Liu JZ, Wu JH, Cheng J, Zhou JH, Cen KF, Fuel Process. Technol., 130, 62, 2015
  16. Bevilacqua P, Ferrara G, Int. J. Miner. Process., 95, 117, 1996
  17. Mahamud MM, Novo MF, Fuel, 87(2), 222, 2008
  18. Cheng J, Wang X, Si TT, Zhou F, Zhou JH, Cen KF, Fuel Process. Technol., 149, 49, 2016
  19. Song H, Min L, Jun X, Sun LS, Li PS, Su S, Sun XX, Fuel, 83(10), 1307, 2004
  20. Zuo W, Zhao Y, He Y, Shi F, Duan C, Int. J. Mining Sci. Technol., 22, 121, 2012
  21. Lester E, Kingman S, Energy Fuels, 18(1), 140, 2004
  22. Samanli S, Fuel, 90(2), 659, 2011
  23. Wang X, He R, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 466, 2007
  24. Friesen WI, Mikula RJ, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 120, 263, 1987
  25. Sing KSW, Williams RT, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 22, 773, 2004
  26. Lai J, Wang G, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 24, 185, 2015
  27. Li KW, Home RN, Geothermics, 35(2), 198, 2006