Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.4, 1133-1140, 2017
Leaching kinetics of a Nigerian complex covellite ore by the ammonia-ammonium sulfate solution
Hydrometallurgical treatment of copper sulfide ore is increasingly establishing itself as a feasible route for the extraction of copper and recovery of associated precious metals value. This is attributed to the merits of this route, which include suitability for low-grade and complex ores, high recoveries, competitive economics, and other operational features. The leaching kinetics of Nigerian complex covellite ore was investigated in ammonia-ammonium sulfate solution. The concentration of ammonia and ammonium sulfate, the ore particle size, and the temperature were chosen as parameters in the experiments. The results show that temperature, concentration of ammonia-ammonium sulfate has favorable influence on the leaching rate of covellite ores; however, leaching rate decreases with increasing particle size. At optimal conditions (1.75mol/L NH4OH+0.5mol/L (NH4)2SO4, -90+75 μm, 75 °C, with moderate stirring) about 86.2% of copper ore reacted within 120 minutes. The mechanism of the leaching was further established by characterizing the raw ore and the leached residue by EDXRF - chemical composition, SEM - structural morphology and XRD - phase identification studies. From the X-ray diffraction analysis, the partially unreacted Cu and S phases were presumed to be CuO, and the iron present in the CuS phase was mainly converted to hematite (Fe2O3·H2O), as the CuS phase disintegrated and remained in the residue afterward.
[References]
  1. KunKul A, Gulezgin A, Demirkiran N, CI & CEQ., 19(1), 25, 2013
  2. Dutrizac JE, Miller JD, Wadsworth ME, Metall. Mater. Trans. B-Proc. Metall. Mater. Proc. Sci., 10B, 149, 1979
  3. Calban T, Colak S, Yesilyurt M, Chem. Eng. Commun., 192(10-12), 1515, 2005
  4. Ekmekyapar A, Oya R, Kunkul A, J. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q., 17(4), 261, 2003
  5. Goh SW, Buckley AN, Lamb RN, Miner. Eng., 19(2), 204, 2006
  6. Schlesinger M, King M, Sole K, Davenport W, Extractive metallurgy of copper, (fifth edition), Elsevier, 1 (2011).
  7. Sullivan J, US Bureau of Mines, Technical Paper 487 (1930).
  8. Liang W, Whangbo MH, Solid State Commun., 85(5), 405, 1993
  9. Tezuka K, Sheets WC, Kurihara R, Shan YJ, Imoto H, Marks TJ, Poeppelmeier KR, Solid State Sci., 9, 95, 2007
  10. Ghosh S, Ambade B, Prasad SK, Choudhary AK, Int. J. Eng. Sci., 1(9), 8, 2012
  11. Arzutug ME, Kocakerim MM, Copur M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(15), 4118, 2004
  12. Liu W, Tang MT, Tang CB, He J, Yang SH, Yang JG, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 20, 910, 2010
  13. Wang X, Chen Q, Hu H, Yin Z, Xiao Z, Hydrometallurgy, 99(3/4), 231, 2009
  14. Bingol D, Canbazoglu M, Aydgan S, Hydrometallurgy, 76(1/2), 55, 2005
  15. Woode MY, Acheampong MA, Achaw OW, IJAR, 2(5), 1132, 2014
  16. Liu Z, Yin Z, Hu H, Chen Q, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 22, 2822, 2012
  17. Antonijevic MM, Dimitrijevic MD, Stevanovic ZO, Serbula SM, Bogdanovic GD, J. Hazard. Mater., 158(1), 23, 2008
  18. Bingol D, Canbazoglu M, Hydrometallurgy, 72(1/2), 159, 2004
  19. Ata ON, Colak S, Ekinci Z, Copur M, Chem. Eng. Technol., 24(4), 409, 2001
  20. Baba AA, Ayinla KI, Adekola FA, Bale RB, Ghosh MK, Alabi AF, Sheik A, Folorunso IO, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 20(11), 1021, 2013
  21. Park KH, Mohapatra D, Reddy BR, Nam CW, Hydrometallurgy, 86(3-4), 164, 2007
  22. Cambazoglu M, Bingol D, Guler H, J. Ore Dressing, 7, 1, 2005
  23. Reilly IG, Scott DS, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 55, 527, 1977
  24. Scott WW, Standard Methods of Chemical Analysis; Van Nostrand, New York (1963).
  25. Levenspiel O, Chemical Reaction Engineering, Wiley, New York, 361 (1972).
  26. Bell SL, Welch GD, Bennett PG, Hydrometallurgy, 39(1-3), 11, 1995
  27. You-Cai L, Wei Y, Jiang-Gang F, Li-Feng L, Dong Q, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 91(4), 770, 2012