Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.3, 822-828, 2017
An experimental and statistical model of a cyclic pressure swing adsorption column for hydrogen purification
An experimental and statistical study was performed for the purification of hydrogen in an H2/CO2 mixture using the PSA process with activated carbon. This process has been extensively used for the high purification of gas mixtures. Central composite design (CCD) was used for the modeling and optimization of the process, regardless of complex and time-consuming equations generally employed in the literature. The statistical analysis of models, as obtained from the CCD method, revealed that distinct second-order polynomial equations, with F-value more than 200, p-value less than 0.0001, and R-squared more than 0.9900, could predict the experimental data for purity, recovery and productivity of hydrogen. Based on the established models, as the purge-to-feed (P/F) ratio increased, the purity increased, while the recovery and productivity decreased. The recovery and productivity first increased and then decreased as adsorption time increased. Thus, the optimal condition of the PSA process was obtained using the CCD models.
[References]
  1. Gupta RB, Hydrogen fuel: production, transport, and storage, CRC Press, New York (2008).
  2. Liu K, Song C, Subramani V, Hydrogen and syngas production and purification technologies, Wiley, New Jersey (2010).
  3. Ockwig NW, Nenoff TM, Chem. Rev., 107(10), 4078, 2007
  4. Lubitz W, Tumas W, Chem. Rev., 107(10), 3900, 2007
  5. Sircar S, Golden TC, Sep. Sci. Technol., 35(5), 667, 2000
  6. Sircar S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41(6), 1389, 2002
  7. Yang R, Doong S, AIChE J., 31, 1829, 1985
  8. Moon DK, Kim YH, Ahn H, Lee CH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53(40), 15447, 2014
  9. Lopes FVS, Grande CA, Rodrigues AE, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66(3), 303, 2011
  10. Casas N, Schell J, Pini R, Mazzotti M, Adsorption, 18, 143, 2012
  11. Kim YM, Suh SS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(3), 401, 1999
  12. Choi WK, Kwon TI, Yeo YK, Lee H, Song HK, Na BK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(4), 617, 2003
  13. Yang J, Han S, Cho C, Lee CH, Lee H, Sep. Technol., 5(4), 239, 1995
  14. Mivechian A, Pakizeh M, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(4), 937, 2013
  15. Roosta M, Ghaedi M, Danesgfar A, Sahraei R, Spectroc. Acta Pt. A-Molec. Biomolec. Spectr., 122, 223, 2014
  16. Savic IM, Stojiljkovic ST, Savic IM, Stojanovic SB, Moder K, Chem. Eng. Technol., 35(11), 2007, 2012
  17. Jamshidi M, Ghaedi M, Dashtian K, Ghaedi A, Hajjati S, Goudarzi A, Alipanahpour E, Spectroc. Acta Pt. A-Molec. Biomolec. Spectr., 153, 257, 2016
  18. Box GEP, Wilson KB, J. Royal Statis. Soc., 1, 13, 1951
  19. Pannerselvam R, Design and analysis of experiments, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi (2012).
  20. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM, Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments, Wiley, New Jersy (2016).