Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.3, 806-813, 2017
Adsorption and kinetics of elemental mercury vapor on activated carbons impregnated with potassium iodide, hydrogen chloride, and sulfur
Coal combustion emits large amounts of elemental mercury that cannot be captured by air pollution control devices such as flue gas desulfurization because of its insolubility. Therefore, technological advances are necessary for capturing elemental mercury. We conducted various tests on adsorption of elemental mercury using KI-, HCl-, and S-impregnated activated carbons, which were compared with virgin activated carbon. Tests with virgin activated carbon revealed that the optimal adsorption temperature for capturing elemental mercury was 363 K. The adsorption efficiency for elemental mercury was nearly 100% using activated carbon impregnated with 1% and 5% KI and 1%, 5%, and 10% HCl. Through kinetic analyses of the impregnated activated carbons, the optimal equilibrium adsorption capacities of KI-, HCl-, and S-impregnated activated carbons for mercury were determined to be 333.3, 333.3, and 256.4mg/g, respectively, by using a pseudo second-order kinetic model.
[References]
  1. Pirrone N, Mason R, Mercury fate and transport in the global atmosphere (2009).
  2. US Environmental Protection Agency, Mercury study report to congress (1997).
  3. US Environmental Protection Agency, Control mercury emissions from coal fired electric utility boilers (2005).
  4. US Environmental Protection Agency, Preliminary estimates of performance and cost of mercury emission control technology applications on electric utility boilers (2004).
  5. Pavlish JH, Sondreal EA, Mann MD, Olson ES, Galbreath KC, Laudal DL, Benson SA, Fuel Process. Technol., 82(2-3), 89, 2003
  6. Lee SJ, Seo YC, Jurng J, Lee TG, Atmos. Environ., 38, 4887, 2004
  7. Jurng J, Lee TG, Lee GW, Lee SJ, Kim BH, Seier J, Chemosphere, 47, 907, 2002
  8. Saha A, Energy Fuels, 28(6), 4021, 2014
  9. Pan HY, Minet RG, Benson SW, Tsotsis TT, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33(12), 2996, 1994
  10. Du W, Yin LB, Zhuo YQ, Xu QS, Zhang L, Chen CH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53(2), 582, 2014
  11. Cai J, Shen BX, Li Z, Chen JH, He C, Chem. Eng. J., 241, 19, 2014
  12. Shen B, Chen J, Yue S, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 203, 216, 2015
  13. His HC, Rood MJ, Abadi MR, Chen S, Chang R, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 128, 1080, 2002
  14. Ho YS, McKAY G, Trans Institution Chem. Engineers, 76(Part B), 1998
  15. Kumar KV, J. Hazard. Mater., 137(3), 1538, 2006
  16. Skodras G, Diamantopoulou I, Pantoleontos G, Sakellaropoulos GP, Materials, 158, 1, 2009
  17. Asasian N, Kaghazchi T, Faramarzi A, Siboni AH, Kesheh RA, Kavand M, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1588, 2014
  18. Raji F, Pakizeh M, Appl. Surf. Sci., 301, 568, 2014
  19. Cui LM, Guo XY, Wei Q, Wang YG, Gao L, Yan LG, Yan T, Du B, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 439, 112, 2015