About The Journal
  Aims and Scope
  Editorial Board
  Submit a Manuscript 
  Subscription Information
  Guidelines for Publication
  Ethics
Articles & Issues
  Search
  Issue
  Online First
  KJChE on
For Authors
  Instructions to Authors
  Ethical Responsibilities of
  Authors in KJChE
  Ethics in Publishing
  Peer Review Process
  Author's Checklist
  Copyright Transfer Form
Contact us
 
 
 
Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.3, 619-627, 2017
FTA-FMEA-based validity verification techniques for safety standards
Chae CK, Ko JW
Scientific and technological advances have yielded a plethora of benefits, but the associated risks have increased as well. Although numerous safety standards have been established for various applications, these standards have not been adequately verified. In this study, a method is proposed for prioritizing safety standard priorities on the basis of minimal cut sets. In addition, safety standards obtained through fault tree analysis are applied to the breakdown modes and accident cause removal methods of failure mode and effects analysis to develop a validity verification method for safety standard sets. The developed method was applied to a gas-boiler exhaust system as a case study, and the validity of the safety standard sets and improvements in the safety standards were verified on the basis of the established safety standard priorities.
Keywords: Safety Standard; Failure Mode and Effects Analysis; Fault Tree Analysis; Minimal Cut Set; Safety Priority; Gas Boiler
[References]
  1. Lee KR, Innovation Strategy to Mitigate Major Risks of the Korean Society, Science & Technology Policy Institute (2003).
  2. Ma BC, Kwon HM, Kim YC, J. Korean Soc. Saf., 27(6), 64, 2012
  3. Rhie KW, Kim TH, Korea Saf. Manage. Sci., 14(1), 95, 2012
  4. Mun BK, A Study on Efficient Safety Management of Disaster Risk Facility, Ph.D. Dissertation, Chonnam National University, Chonnam, Korea (2014).
  5. Mohammad M, Risk Analysis in Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (2006).
  6. Nicholas JB, System Safety Engineering and Risk Assessment, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (2014).
  7. Michael TT, Risk-Based Reliability Analysis and Generic Principles for Risk Reduction, Elsevier, London (2007).
  8. Kim DJ, Kim HC, Kim JO, Trans. Korean Inst. Electr. Eng., 58(1), 27, 2009
  9. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory, Fault Tree Handbook (1981).
  10. Modarres M, Risk Analysis in Engineering, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida (2006).
  11. Kim YH, So W, Shin D, Yoon ES, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(6), 1322, 2011
  12. Kim MH, Woo IS, J. Korean Soc. Saf., 28(4), 81, 2013
  13. Carl SC, Effective FMEAs, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey (2012).
  14. Stamatis DH, Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, ASQ, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (2003).
  15. Moon KH, Kim SH, Choi JH, Kim JK, J. Korean Soc. Aviation Aeronautics, 21(4), 2013
  16. Lee SI, Chu BS, Chang DJ, Int. J. Precision Eng. Manufacturing, 15(2), 331, 2014
  17. Kim MH, Jin EJ, Park MG, J. Korea Multimedia Soc., 16(1), 87, 2013
  18. Jang HA, Risk Evaluation of Hierarchical Failure Causes in FMEA, Ph.D. Dissertation, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea (2015).
  19. Jin EJ, Kim MH, Park MG, KIPS Trans. Software Data Eng., 2(1), 7, 2013
  20. Kim MH, Toyib W, Park MG, KIPS Trans. Computer Communication System, 2(12), 541, 2013
  21. Toyib W, An Integrative Method of FTA and Software FMEA for Security Analysis of a Smartphone, ME Dissertation, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea (2012).
  22. Kim DJ, Kim JO, Kim HC, Railway J., 12(3), 342, 2009
참고문헌정보(참고문헌, 인용문헌)는 화학공학소재연구정보센터에 의해 제공되고 있습니다.