Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.34, No.1, 259-265, 2017
High performance methyl orange capture on magnetic nanoporous MCM-41 prepared by incipient wetness impregnation method
The Magnetic nanoporous material Fe/MCM-41 was prepared, and its physical characterization studied, to determine the effect of its properties on separation efficiency of methyl orange (MO) from wastewater by adsorption process. The experimental results were analyzed for both adsorbent mesoporous material samples, MCM-41 and magnetic Fe/MCM-41, in order to select the best operating conditions for the different studied parameters, which are: constant temperature (20 °C), pH: (2) adsorbent dosage (0.03 gm), contact time (10minute) and concentrations (30mg/L). The results demonstrate that the adsorption processes can be well fitted by the Langmuir isotherm model for pure MCM-41, with a correlation coefficient of (0.999), and fitted by the Freundlich isotherm model for magnetic Fe/MCM-41, with a correlation coefficient of (0.994). The adsorption kinetics of MO on to MCM-41 and Fe/MCM-41 are well described by a pseudo-second-order kinetic model.
[References]
  1. Rodriguez A, Garcia J, Ovejero G, Mestanza M, J. Hazard. Mater., 172, 1311, 2012
  2. Forgacs E, Cserhati T, Oros G, Environ. Int., 30, 953, 2009
  3. Alsalhy QF, Albyati TM, Zablouk MA, Chem. Eng. Commun., 200(1), 1, 2013
  4. Albayati TM, Doyle AM, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 31(5), 459, 2013
  5. Albayati TM, Doyle AM, Chem.: Bulgarian J. Sci. Education, 23(1), 105, 2014
  6. Al-Bayati TM, Part. Sci. Technol., 32(6), 616, 2014
  7. Sabri AA, Albayati TM, Alazawi RA, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(9), 1835, 2015
  8. Babel S, Kurniawan TA, J. Hazard. Mater., 97(1-3), 219, 2003
  9. Gupta VK, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 2313, 2009
  10. Lu AH, Li WC, Kiefer A, Schmidt W, Bill E, Fink G, Schuth F, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126(28), 8616, 2004
  11. Wu PG, Zhu JH, Xu ZH, Adv. Funct. Mater., 14(4), 345, 2004
  12. Huang S, Yang P, Cheng Z, Li C, Fan Y, Kong D, Lin J, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 7130, 2008
  13. Giri S, Trewyn BG, Stellmaker MP, Lin VS, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit., 44, 5038, 2005
  14. Deng Y, Qi D, Deng C, Zhang X, Zhao D, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130(1), 28, 2008
  15. Xingbin Y, Jiangtao C, Qunji X, Philippe M, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 135, 137, 2010
  16. Chen H, Wang Y, Ceram. Int., 28, 541, 2002
  17. Albayati TM, Doyle AM, J. Nanopart. Res., 17(2), 109, 2015
  18. Langmuir I, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 38(11), 2221, 1916
  19. Weber WJ, Chakravorti RK, J. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng., 20, 228, 1974
  20. Chen M, Chen Y, Diao GW, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55(11), 5109, 2010
  21. Freundlich HM, Colloid Capillary Chemistry, 3(12), 1454, 1926
  22. Freundlich HM, Z. Phys. Chem., 57A, 385, 1906
  23. Ling YH, Long MC, Hu PD, Chen Y, Huang JW, J. Hazard. Mater., 264, 195, 2014
  24. Chen XQ, Lam KF, Yeung KL, Chem. Eng. J., 172(2-3), 728, 2011
  25. Ursachi I, Stancu A, Vasile A, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 377, 184, 2012
  26. Liu BS, Xu DF, Chu JX, Liu W, Au CT, Energy Fuels, 21(1), 250, 2007
  27. Chen XQ, Arruebo M, Yeung KL, Catal. Today, 204, 140, 2013
  28. Weijia Z, Wenhe SZ, Yingjun W, Hongshi Z, Zhengmao L, Shunpu Y, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 321, 1025, 2009
  29. Yujin L, Kunyan S, Rongzhan L, Xin Z, Yang Z, Hongchao L, Yanzhi X, Energy Procedia, 61, 863, 2012
  30. Rengaraj S, Joo CK, Kim Y, Yi J, J. Hazard. Mater., 102(2-3), 257, 2003
  31. Tang J, Yang ZF, Yi YJ, Procedia Environ. Sci., 13, 2179, 2012
  32. Meng Q, Zhang X, He C, Zhou P, Su W, Duan C, Talanta, 84, 53, 2011
  33. Ruihua H, Qian L, Jie H, Bingchao Y, Arabian J. Chem., DOI:10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.05.017., 2013
  34. Fang-Chang T, Ning M, Tai-Chin C, Lung-Chang T, Jing-Jing S, Xia AY, Jiang T, Shuenn-Kung S, Fu-Sheng C, J. Water Process Eng., 1, 2, 2014
  35. Tonghao L, Yanhui L, Qiuju D, Jiankun S, Yuqin J, Guangming Y, Zonghua W, Yanzhi X, Wei Z, Kunlin W, Hongwei Z, Dehai W, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 90, 197, 2012
  36. Yao YJ, He B, Xu FF, Chen XF, Chem. Eng. J., 170(1), 82, 2011