Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.33, No.12, 3487-3492, 2016
Comparative study of homogeneous nucleation rate models for wet steam condensing flows
To accurately describe the homogeneous nucleation process in a wet-steam dual-phase flow and to improve the reliability of computations of the condensing steam flow, classical homogeneous nucleation theories were derived and summarized based on the molecular agglomerate thermodynamic free energies. To obtain more accurate homogeneous nucleation rates, various modified homogeneous nucleation rate models were described. Experimental data were used in a comparative study of these models to select a nucleation rate model to provide calculated values for engineering projects. This study indicates that the main difference between different nucleation theories lies in the difference in the influence of temperature on the nucleation rate.
[References]
  1. Moore MJ, Sieverding CH, Two-Phase Steam Flow in Turbines and Separators, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, London (1976).
  2. Baumann K, J. Inst. Elec. Engrs., 59, 565, 1921
  3. Volmer M, Weber A, Z. Phys. Chem., 119, 277, 1926
  4. Becker R, Doring W, Annalen der Physik, 416, 719, 1935
  5. Lothe J, Pound GM, J. Chem. Phys., 36, 2080, 1962
  6. Courtney WG, J. Chem. Phys., 36, 2009, 1962
  7. Bekryaev VI, Kryukova SV, Russian Meteorology Hydrology, 34, 657, 2009
  8. Ickes L, Welti A, Hoose C, Lohmann U, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 5514, 2015
  9. Abraham FF, Zettlemoyer AC, Homogeneous Nucleation Theory, Academic Press, New York (1974).
  10. Han ZH, Han X, Li P, CIESC J., 66, 4312, 2015
  11. Luijten CCM, Nucleation and Droplet Growth at High Pressure, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Fluid Dynamics, Eindhoven University of Technology (1998).
  12. Bakhtar F, Young JB, White AJ, Simpson DA, J. Mechanical Eng. Sci., 219, 1315, 2005
  13. Kantrowitz A, J. Chem. Phys., 19, 1097, 1951
  14. Feder J, Russell KC, Lothe J, Pound GM, Adv. Phys., 15, 111, 1966
  15. Wyslouzil BE, Seinfeld JH, J. Chem. Phys., 97, 2661, 1992
  16. Courtney WG, J. Chem. Phys., 35, 2249, 1961
  17. Ford IJ, Phys. Rev. E, 56, 5615, 1997
  18. Reiss H, Kegel WK, Katz JL, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78, 4506, 1997
  19. Girshick SL, Chiu C, J. Chem. Phys., 93, 1273, 1990
  20. Katz JL, Pure Appl. Chem., 64, 1661, 1992
  21. Wolk J, Strey R, Heath CH, Wyslouzil BE, J. Chem. Phys., 117, 4654, 2002
  22. Wilemski G, J. Chem. Phys., 103(3), 1119, 1995
  23. Wolk J, Strey R, J. Phys. Chem. B, 105(47), 11683, 2001
  24. Heist RH, Reiss H, J. Chem. Phys., 59, 665, 1973
  25. Anderson RJ, Miller RC, Kassner JL, Hagen DE, J. Atmospheric Sci., 37, 2509, 1980
  26. Miller RC, Anderson RJ, Kassner JL, J. Chem. Phys., 78, 3204, 1983